Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types

The Chinese government has published an official guide specifying the aims for reading in Chinese and the expected comprehension levels for different proficiency learners, with regard to teaching and learning Chinese as a second or foreign language. However, due to lack of teacher training for its i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mi, Soon Kim, Hyun, Jung Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UKM 2014
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7001/1/3423-13529-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7001/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.7001
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.70012016-12-14T06:42:49Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7001/ Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types Mi, Soon Kim Hyun, Jung Kim The Chinese government has published an official guide specifying the aims for reading in Chinese and the expected comprehension levels for different proficiency learners, with regard to teaching and learning Chinese as a second or foreign language. However, due to lack of teacher training for its implementation, this guide has rarely been used for teaching reading to Chinese language learners and has rarely been used for evaluating their reading ability. Therefore, it appears that teaching and assessing reading comprehension have not been based on a theoretical background of reading ability. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to provide validity evidence of a Chinese reading test developed based on a theoretical model of reading ability; and (2) to examine reading test performance of Chinese learners with various reading ability levels. For the purpose of this study, reading ability was defined based on a meaning-based model that included three layers of reading comprehension: literal, intended, and implied meanings of a reading text. A total of 248 Korean university students were divided into three levels, and their test performances were analyzed and compared for the three meaning types using structural equation modeling and regression analysis. The results suggest that the test performance structure represented the meaning-based model in general, thereby providing validity evidence of the test. Further analyses revealed that the three groups differed from one another with respect to their understanding of literal, intended, and implied meanings. The findings provide pedagogical implications for teaching Chinese language learners with different reading proficiency levels. Penerbit UKM 2014-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7001/1/3423-13529-1-PB.pdf Mi, Soon Kim and Hyun, Jung Kim (2014) Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 14 (1). pp. 77-100. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description The Chinese government has published an official guide specifying the aims for reading in Chinese and the expected comprehension levels for different proficiency learners, with regard to teaching and learning Chinese as a second or foreign language. However, due to lack of teacher training for its implementation, this guide has rarely been used for teaching reading to Chinese language learners and has rarely been used for evaluating their reading ability. Therefore, it appears that teaching and assessing reading comprehension have not been based on a theoretical background of reading ability. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to provide validity evidence of a Chinese reading test developed based on a theoretical model of reading ability; and (2) to examine reading test performance of Chinese learners with various reading ability levels. For the purpose of this study, reading ability was defined based on a meaning-based model that included three layers of reading comprehension: literal, intended, and implied meanings of a reading text. A total of 248 Korean university students were divided into three levels, and their test performances were analyzed and compared for the three meaning types using structural equation modeling and regression analysis. The results suggest that the test performance structure represented the meaning-based model in general, thereby providing validity evidence of the test. Further analyses revealed that the three groups differed from one another with respect to their understanding of literal, intended, and implied meanings. The findings provide pedagogical implications for teaching Chinese language learners with different reading proficiency levels.
format Article
author Mi, Soon Kim
Hyun, Jung Kim
spellingShingle Mi, Soon Kim
Hyun, Jung Kim
Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
author_facet Mi, Soon Kim
Hyun, Jung Kim
author_sort Mi, Soon Kim
title Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
title_short Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
title_full Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
title_fullStr Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
title_full_unstemmed Investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
title_sort investigating chinese language learners’ reading comprehension for different meaning types
publisher Penerbit UKM
publishDate 2014
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7001/1/3423-13529-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7001/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
_version_ 1643736969516154880