Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance

Research studies on reading strategy use among ESL/EFL readers are increasingly becoming one of the most attended topics for researchers and educators. This study investigated the reading strategies used by 290 Chinese EFL second year undergraduates and examined the relationship between their readin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lijuan Li, Sarjit Kaur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2014
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7762/1/5585-18830-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7762/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.7762
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.77622016-12-14T06:45:06Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7762/ Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance Lijuan Li, Sarjit Kaur, Research studies on reading strategy use among ESL/EFL readers are increasingly becoming one of the most attended topics for researchers and educators. This study investigated the reading strategies used by 290 Chinese EFL second year undergraduates and examined the relationship between their reading strategy use and reading test performance. The participants reported their use of reading strategies through the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) in three categories: global reading strategies (GLOB), problem solving strategies (PROB) and support reading strategies (SUP). Students’ reading test performance was measured by using the national College English Test Band-4 (CET-4). Results showed that students used overall reading strategies at a medium frequency level. They used PROB strategies most frequently (at a high level), followed by GLOB strategies (at a medium level). The least frequently used were SUP strategies (at a medium level). The most frequently used individual strategies were re-reading, regaining concentration and guessing the content of the text. The least frequently used strategies included reading aloud, questioning, paraphrasing, and translating. There was no significant relationship between students’ overall reading strategy use and their general reading test performance. However, significant relationship was found between some individual reading strategies and different test formats. Students’ banked cloze test performance was positively correlated to GLOB strategies. SUP strategies were negatively correlated to students’ skimming and scanning performance. Most PROB strategies were related to student performance in fast reading either positively or negatively. Pedagogical implications are discussed in relation to the Chinese EFL context. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7762/1/5585-18830-1-PB.pdf Lijuan Li, and Sarjit Kaur, (2014) Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance. GEMA ; Online Journal of Language Studies, 14 (3). pp. 1-18. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Research studies on reading strategy use among ESL/EFL readers are increasingly becoming one of the most attended topics for researchers and educators. This study investigated the reading strategies used by 290 Chinese EFL second year undergraduates and examined the relationship between their reading strategy use and reading test performance. The participants reported their use of reading strategies through the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) in three categories: global reading strategies (GLOB), problem solving strategies (PROB) and support reading strategies (SUP). Students’ reading test performance was measured by using the national College English Test Band-4 (CET-4). Results showed that students used overall reading strategies at a medium frequency level. They used PROB strategies most frequently (at a high level), followed by GLOB strategies (at a medium level). The least frequently used were SUP strategies (at a medium level). The most frequently used individual strategies were re-reading, regaining concentration and guessing the content of the text. The least frequently used strategies included reading aloud, questioning, paraphrasing, and translating. There was no significant relationship between students’ overall reading strategy use and their general reading test performance. However, significant relationship was found between some individual reading strategies and different test formats. Students’ banked cloze test performance was positively correlated to GLOB strategies. SUP strategies were negatively correlated to students’ skimming and scanning performance. Most PROB strategies were related to student performance in fast reading either positively or negatively. Pedagogical implications are discussed in relation to the Chinese EFL context.
format Article
author Lijuan Li,
Sarjit Kaur,
spellingShingle Lijuan Li,
Sarjit Kaur,
Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
author_facet Lijuan Li,
Sarjit Kaur,
author_sort Lijuan Li,
title Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
title_short Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
title_full Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
title_fullStr Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
title_full_unstemmed Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
title_sort textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2014
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7762/1/5585-18830-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7762/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
_version_ 1643737234161008640