An analysis of Singapore’s aware case

Our case involves the women’s group Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE), founded on 25 November 1985, which has proven itself to be a tireless long-term campaigner for women’s rights in Singapore. In this ‘AWARE case’, the executive committee of AWARE was surreptitiously taken over...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James, Kieran, Grant, Bligh, Kwai, Jenny Sim Leung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UKM 2013
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8249/1/Kieran_James%2C_Bligh_Grant_and_Jenny_Kwai-Sim_Leung_Jebat_2_December_2013_no_1.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8249/
http://www.ukm.my/jebat/v2/index.php
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.8249
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.82492016-12-14T06:46:40Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8249/ An analysis of Singapore’s aware case James, Kieran Grant, Bligh Kwai, Jenny Sim Leung Our case involves the women’s group Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE), founded on 25 November 1985, which has proven itself to be a tireless long-term campaigner for women’s rights in Singapore. In this ‘AWARE case’, the executive committee of AWARE was surreptitiously taken over by fundamentalist Christian women from Church of Our Saviour at AWARE’s 28 March 2009 Annual General Meeting. In the second phase of this saga, the Extraordinary General Meeting on 2 May 2009 led to the secular ‘Old Guard’ recapturing AWARE and the Church of Our Saviour group being removed from power. This AWARE case shows the rise in power of fundamentalist Protestant Christianity within Singapore and its growing influence upon English-educated Chinese-Singaporeans. The fact that this upper middle-class demographic traditionally has supported the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) is probably one key reason why the government decided not to intervene in this particular case as part of ‘the more consultative style of government’ first introduced by former PM Goh Chok Tong. The PAP government’s non-intervention in the takeover and recapture is extremely significant given its past record of authoritarian micro-management of dissent and oppositional opinions. It suggests more freedom for some NGOs in the contemporary era of Lee Hsien Loong’s prime-ministership. Significantly, PAP may be splitting into ‘reformist’ and ‘hardline’ factions headed by, respectively, Lee Hsien Loong and the MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC Mr Wong Kan Seng. Penerbit UKM 2013-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8249/1/Kieran_James%2C_Bligh_Grant_and_Jenny_Kwai-Sim_Leung_Jebat_2_December_2013_no_1.pdf James, Kieran and Grant, Bligh and Kwai, Jenny Sim Leung (2013) An analysis of Singapore’s aware case. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies, 40 (2). pp. 1-23. ISSN 2180-0251 http://www.ukm.my/jebat/v2/index.php
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Our case involves the women’s group Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE), founded on 25 November 1985, which has proven itself to be a tireless long-term campaigner for women’s rights in Singapore. In this ‘AWARE case’, the executive committee of AWARE was surreptitiously taken over by fundamentalist Christian women from Church of Our Saviour at AWARE’s 28 March 2009 Annual General Meeting. In the second phase of this saga, the Extraordinary General Meeting on 2 May 2009 led to the secular ‘Old Guard’ recapturing AWARE and the Church of Our Saviour group being removed from power. This AWARE case shows the rise in power of fundamentalist Protestant Christianity within Singapore and its growing influence upon English-educated Chinese-Singaporeans. The fact that this upper middle-class demographic traditionally has supported the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) is probably one key reason why the government decided not to intervene in this particular case as part of ‘the more consultative style of government’ first introduced by former PM Goh Chok Tong. The PAP government’s non-intervention in the takeover and recapture is extremely significant given its past record of authoritarian micro-management of dissent and oppositional opinions. It suggests more freedom for some NGOs in the contemporary era of Lee Hsien Loong’s prime-ministership. Significantly, PAP may be splitting into ‘reformist’ and ‘hardline’ factions headed by, respectively, Lee Hsien Loong and the MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC Mr Wong Kan Seng.
format Article
author James, Kieran
Grant, Bligh
Kwai, Jenny Sim Leung
spellingShingle James, Kieran
Grant, Bligh
Kwai, Jenny Sim Leung
An analysis of Singapore’s aware case
author_facet James, Kieran
Grant, Bligh
Kwai, Jenny Sim Leung
author_sort James, Kieran
title An analysis of Singapore’s aware case
title_short An analysis of Singapore’s aware case
title_full An analysis of Singapore’s aware case
title_fullStr An analysis of Singapore’s aware case
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of Singapore’s aware case
title_sort analysis of singapore’s aware case
publisher Penerbit UKM
publishDate 2013
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8249/1/Kieran_James%2C_Bligh_Grant_and_Jenny_Kwai-Sim_Leung_Jebat_2_December_2013_no_1.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8249/
http://www.ukm.my/jebat/v2/index.php
_version_ 1643737414628278272