Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication

This article touches on Corruption and Reversal Burden of Proof in accordance with Article 37 of Indonesian Law No. 31 of 1999 on Corruption Crime Eradication. It deals with questions on whether or not the implementation of the reversal burden of proof in corruption cases may prevent, reduce, or e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wahyu Wiriadinata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UKM 2014
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8455/1/Corruption_and_Reversal_Burden_of_Proof_An_Insight_Into_Article_37_of_Indonesian_Law_No_31_of_1999_on_Corruption_Eradication.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8455/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/juum
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.8455
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.84552019-05-14T04:43:54Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8455/ Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication Wahyu Wiriadinata, This article touches on Corruption and Reversal Burden of Proof in accordance with Article 37 of Indonesian Law No. 31 of 1999 on Corruption Crime Eradication. It deals with questions on whether or not the implementation of the reversal burden of proof in corruption cases may prevent, reduce, or even eliminate crimes of corruption in Indonesia. This article also discusses on the extent of the effectiveness of the reversal burden of proof in Indonesia as laid down in the legislation. This research is based on a theoretical framework by Roscoe Pound, which suggests that law is a tool of social engineering. This theory has been cited by Muchtar Kusumaatmadja, who modified and adapted it to Indonesia conditions, making law as a social engineering medium. One of the changes could be seen in the area of burden of proof with the conventional system being replaced by a reversal one. The juridical-normative method is used in the analysis which involves the study of legislation related to reversal burden of proof. This research concludes that corruption is still rampant in Indonesia and that Article 37 has not been that effective in eradicating corruption crimes Penerbit UKM 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8455/1/Corruption_and_Reversal_Burden_of_Proof_An_Insight_Into_Article_37_of_Indonesian_Law_No_31_of_1999_on_Corruption_Eradication.pdf Wahyu Wiriadinata, (2014) Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 18 . pp. 1-7. ISSN 1394-7729 http://ejournal.ukm.my/juum
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description This article touches on Corruption and Reversal Burden of Proof in accordance with Article 37 of Indonesian Law No. 31 of 1999 on Corruption Crime Eradication. It deals with questions on whether or not the implementation of the reversal burden of proof in corruption cases may prevent, reduce, or even eliminate crimes of corruption in Indonesia. This article also discusses on the extent of the effectiveness of the reversal burden of proof in Indonesia as laid down in the legislation. This research is based on a theoretical framework by Roscoe Pound, which suggests that law is a tool of social engineering. This theory has been cited by Muchtar Kusumaatmadja, who modified and adapted it to Indonesia conditions, making law as a social engineering medium. One of the changes could be seen in the area of burden of proof with the conventional system being replaced by a reversal one. The juridical-normative method is used in the analysis which involves the study of legislation related to reversal burden of proof. This research concludes that corruption is still rampant in Indonesia and that Article 37 has not been that effective in eradicating corruption crimes
format Article
author Wahyu Wiriadinata,
spellingShingle Wahyu Wiriadinata,
Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
author_facet Wahyu Wiriadinata,
author_sort Wahyu Wiriadinata,
title Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
title_short Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
title_full Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
title_fullStr Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
title_full_unstemmed Corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into Article 37 of Indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
title_sort corruption and reversal burden of proof: an insight into article 37 of indonesian law no. 31 of 1999 on corruption eradication
publisher Penerbit UKM
publishDate 2014
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8455/1/Corruption_and_Reversal_Burden_of_Proof_An_Insight_Into_Article_37_of_Indonesian_Law_No_31_of_1999_on_Corruption_Eradication.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8455/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/juum
_version_ 1643737471594266624