The Effects of the Use of Module-based Concordance Materials and Data-driven Learning (DDL) Approach in Enhancing the Knowledge of Collocations of Prepositions among Malaysian Undergraduate Law Students
Computer technology has revolutionised English Language Teaching and Learning (ELLT) with the advent of Corpus Linguistics. The application of Corpus Linguistics in classrooms, in the so called Corpus (Data)-Driven Learning (DDL) approach, makes use of ‘real-life’ concordance data, and the concor...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/3750/1/FH02-FBK-16-06567.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/3750/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | Computer technology has revolutionised English Language Teaching and Learning (ELLT)
with the advent of Corpus Linguistics. The application of Corpus Linguistics in classrooms, in the so
called Corpus (Data)-Driven Learning (DDL) approach, makes use of ‘real-life’ concordance data,
and the concordance tools train learners to perform hands-on concordancing. It also trains learners
to derive at linguistic rules and meanings based on observations of repetitive words or collocation
patterns as the KWIC (Key-Word-in-Contexts) in the concordance lines. While many have criticised
the application of independent (‘hard’) DDL, as it lacks teacher supervision and increases learners’
cognitive load, this paper aims at investigating the effectiveness of the use of both paper-based (scaffolded) concordance materials (‘soft’) DDL and (‘hard’) DDL (independent online searching) in enhancing the knowledge of collocations of prepositions among law undergraduates at UniSZA (University
of Sultan Zainal Abidin), Malaysia. 40 law undergraduates were involved in this 10-week experimental
study, where 20 students were placed in the experimental group and treated with module-based DDL,
and the other 20 were put in the comparison group and treated with the conventional approach. The
findings showed that the students in the DDL group performed significantly better than the students
in the comparison group in the sentence-completion and in determining the semantic function tasks.
This study recommends explicit teaching of collocations of prepositions via ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ DDL instructions as opposed to independent or ‘hard’ DDL. |
|---|