Discriminant Validity: A Comparison of CBSEM and Consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT Approaches
Discriminant validity is recognized as the essential approach in structural equation modelling method to determine the construct uniqueness in a research model. Using this approach, the applied researchers can identify the distinction role on each construct applied in the study. To date, there are...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/4407/1/FH03-FPP-21-54261.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/4407/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | Discriminant validity is recognized as the essential approach in structural equation modelling method
to determine the construct uniqueness in a research model. Using this approach, the applied
researchers can identify the distinction role on each construct applied in the study. To date, there are
several available approaches has been introduced to perform the discriminant validity. In applied
research, the Fornell & Larcker approach is known as the method of choice for discriminant validity.
Thus, this study attempt to make a comparison Fornell & Larcker approach with HTMT using CBSEM
and Consistent PLS. From here, the results revealed that HTMT based Consistent PLS approach is
comparable to Fornell & Larcker based CBSEM but not empirical standard to Fornell & Larcker based
Consistent PLS. The discussion and recommendations also provided for this justifications. |
|---|