Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View

There has been a lot, more than enough, talks, readings and writings on the axiomic (i.e QaÌiyyah musallamah) scientific causative agent(s), from non-Muslim and Muslims alike. Much has also been said from an Islamic and a Muslim perspective. But the question remains whether or not the notion is t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5151/1/FH02-FKI-17-08445.pdf
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5151/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
Language: English
id my-unisza-ir.5151
record_format eprints
spelling my-unisza-ir.51512022-02-07T03:50:18Z http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5151/ Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc BV1460 Religious Education Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography There has been a lot, more than enough, talks, readings and writings on the axiomic (i.e QaÌiyyah musallamah) scientific causative agent(s), from non-Muslim and Muslims alike. Much has also been said from an Islamic and a Muslim perspective. But the question remains whether or not the notion is totally rejected from the Qur’anic point of view, or it is totally approved. This paper will discuss the notion, which sees the Qur’an as a model for anything and everything. Philosophy, Sciences, Technology, and Religion unanimously agree that anything and everything must have a cause, and hence all ‘causeds’ must have a source; philosophy is yet to substantively satisfy our quest, science is still struggling to allay our fears, technology is yet to convince our minds of its danger(s), and religion has not been fully allowed to freely proof its worth, where then lays the ‘causer’, the ‘medium’ and the ‘caused’? The paper will access some scientific notions of the causative agent(s) in the light of the Qur’anic interpretation of such. The major focus of the paper will basically be on those Qur’anic verses and instances, which are of relevance to ‘cause’ and ‘effect’; it will, based on some Scientific presumption and Revelational instructions, submit that ‘the Scientific notion of the causative agent(s) without exploring the religious evidence is unfounded, if not an hoax. 2016-12 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5151/1/FH02-FKI-17-08445.pdf Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i (2016) Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View. Ponte Multidisciplinary Journal of Sciences & Research, 72 (9). pp. 101-122. ISSN 0032-423X
institution Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
building UNISZA Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
content_source UNISZA Institutional Repository
url_provider https://eprints.unisza.edu.my/
language English
topic BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
BV1460 Religious Education
Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography
spellingShingle BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
BV1460 Religious Education
Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography
Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i
Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View
description There has been a lot, more than enough, talks, readings and writings on the axiomic (i.e QaÌiyyah musallamah) scientific causative agent(s), from non-Muslim and Muslims alike. Much has also been said from an Islamic and a Muslim perspective. But the question remains whether or not the notion is totally rejected from the Qur’anic point of view, or it is totally approved. This paper will discuss the notion, which sees the Qur’an as a model for anything and everything. Philosophy, Sciences, Technology, and Religion unanimously agree that anything and everything must have a cause, and hence all ‘causeds’ must have a source; philosophy is yet to substantively satisfy our quest, science is still struggling to allay our fears, technology is yet to convince our minds of its danger(s), and religion has not been fully allowed to freely proof its worth, where then lays the ‘causer’, the ‘medium’ and the ‘caused’? The paper will access some scientific notions of the causative agent(s) in the light of the Qur’anic interpretation of such. The major focus of the paper will basically be on those Qur’anic verses and instances, which are of relevance to ‘cause’ and ‘effect’; it will, based on some Scientific presumption and Revelational instructions, submit that ‘the Scientific notion of the causative agent(s) without exploring the religious evidence is unfounded, if not an hoax.
format Article
author Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i
author_facet Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i
author_sort Mohammed Muneer'deen, Olodo Al-Shafi'i
title Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View
title_short Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View
title_full Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View
title_fullStr Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View
title_full_unstemmed Sciensophic And Quranic Causative Agent(S): A Comparative View
title_sort sciensophic and quranic causative agent(s): a comparative view
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5151/1/FH02-FKI-17-08445.pdf
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5151/
_version_ 1724079431710932992