The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study

Although a vast body of research has investigated the effectiveness of written corrective feedback on students’ writing accuracy, there is relatively fewer studies that compared the effectiveness of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback. Determining the r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iqbal, Arshad, Saad, Mohammad Azannee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UPSI Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/111417/2/111417_The%20effect%20of%20focused%20and%20comprehensive.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/111417/
https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/AJELP/article/view/8475
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol11.1.9.2023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
Language: English
id my.iium.irep.111417
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.1114172024-03-18T03:36:06Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/111417/ The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study Iqbal, Arshad Saad, Mohammad Azannee L Education (General) Although a vast body of research has investigated the effectiveness of written corrective feedback on students’ writing accuracy, there is relatively fewer studies that compared the effectiveness of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback. Determining the relative efficacy of feedback focus is crucial for writing instruction as it can make error correction less tedious for the teacher and more manageable for the learner. Writing teachers need to know whether students can better internalize a selected number of error categories at a time or cope with feedback provided on all errors simultaneously. This research reports a quantitative study that compared the effectiveness of focused and comprehensive corrective feedback on Saudi Arabia English as a Foreign Language (EFL)learners’ essay writing accuracy. Written essays were collected from 18 Foundation Year, Health Sciences students where they were divided into two experimental groups (N=6) and one control group (N=6). A pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test design was employed to measure the effects of the two types of written corrective feedback on learners’ writing accuracy. The results showed that focused written corrective feedback was not significantly more effective than comprehensive written corrective feedback although it caused lower error means on both the selected error categories as well as on total errors. The results suggest that students and teachers need not view the two types of feedback as mutually exclusive as far as their relative effectiveness is concerned. UPSI Press 2023-06-30 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/111417/2/111417_The%20effect%20of%20focused%20and%20comprehensive.pdf Iqbal, Arshad and Saad, Mohammad Azannee (2023) The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study. The Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 11 (1). pp. 120-133. ISSN 2289-8689 E-ISSN 2289-8697 https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/AJELP/article/view/8475 https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol11.1.9.2023
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Iqbal, Arshad
Saad, Mohammad Azannee
The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
description Although a vast body of research has investigated the effectiveness of written corrective feedback on students’ writing accuracy, there is relatively fewer studies that compared the effectiveness of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback. Determining the relative efficacy of feedback focus is crucial for writing instruction as it can make error correction less tedious for the teacher and more manageable for the learner. Writing teachers need to know whether students can better internalize a selected number of error categories at a time or cope with feedback provided on all errors simultaneously. This research reports a quantitative study that compared the effectiveness of focused and comprehensive corrective feedback on Saudi Arabia English as a Foreign Language (EFL)learners’ essay writing accuracy. Written essays were collected from 18 Foundation Year, Health Sciences students where they were divided into two experimental groups (N=6) and one control group (N=6). A pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test design was employed to measure the effects of the two types of written corrective feedback on learners’ writing accuracy. The results showed that focused written corrective feedback was not significantly more effective than comprehensive written corrective feedback although it caused lower error means on both the selected error categories as well as on total errors. The results suggest that students and teachers need not view the two types of feedback as mutually exclusive as far as their relative effectiveness is concerned.
format Article
author Iqbal, Arshad
Saad, Mohammad Azannee
author_facet Iqbal, Arshad
Saad, Mohammad Azannee
author_sort Iqbal, Arshad
title The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
title_short The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
title_full The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
title_fullStr The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
title_sort effect of focused and comprehensive written corrective feedback on writing accuracy: a comparative study
publisher UPSI Press
publishDate 2023
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/111417/2/111417_The%20effect%20of%20focused%20and%20comprehensive.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/111417/
https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/AJELP/article/view/8475
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol11.1.9.2023
_version_ 1794545288317239296