Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the total anal sphincter–saving technique of ligating the intersphincteric fistula tract for the treatment of fistulain-ano. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of patients with fistula-in-ano treated with the ligation of the intersphin...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Verlag
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/14771/1/Ligation_of_the_Intersphincteric_Fistula_Tract_%28LIFT.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/14771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c160c4 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.iium.irep.14771 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.147712012-01-05T06:22:56Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/14771/ Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano Mohamed Sidek , Ahmad Shanwani Md Nor, Azmi Mohamed Kamil, Nil Amri RD Surgery PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the total anal sphincter–saving technique of ligating the intersphincteric fistula tract for the treatment of fistulain-ano. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of patients with fistula-in-ano treated with the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract technique from May 2007 through September 2008. All patients had fistulas arising from cryptoglandular infections. Recurrence rate, healing time, and morbidities related to the procedure were determined with a standard followup protocol. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with transsphincteric (n � 33) or complex (n � 12) fistulas were included in the study. Five patients (11.1%) had recurrent fistula-in-ano after prior surgery using other recognized treatment procedures. The median age was 41.5 (range, 27–56) years; median follow-up, 9 (range, 2–16) months. Primary healing was achieved in 37 patients (82.2%), with a median healing time of 7 (range, 4–10) weeks. Eight patients (17.7%) had recurrence of fistula between 3 and 8 months after the operation. No clinically significant morbidity was noted in any of the 45 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract technique for fistula-in-ano surgery, which aims at total anal sphincter preservation, appears to be both safe and easy to perform, with encouraging early outcomes. Springer Verlag 2010 Article REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/14771/1/Ligation_of_the_Intersphincteric_Fistula_Tract_%28LIFT.pdf Mohamed Sidek , Ahmad Shanwani and Md Nor, Azmi and Mohamed Kamil, Nil Amri (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 53 (1). pp. 39-42. ISSN 0012-3706 (P), 1530-0358 (O) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c160c4 doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c160c4 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
RD Surgery |
spellingShingle |
RD Surgery Mohamed Sidek , Ahmad Shanwani Md Nor, Azmi Mohamed Kamil, Nil Amri Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
description |
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the total anal sphincter–saving technique of ligating the intersphincteric fistula tract for the treatment of fistulain-ano.
METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of patients with fistula-in-ano treated with the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract technique from May 2007 through September 2008. All patients had fistulas arising from cryptoglandular infections. Recurrence rate, healing time, and morbidities related to the procedure were determined with a standard followup protocol.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients with transsphincteric (n �
33) or complex (n � 12) fistulas were included in the study. Five patients (11.1%) had recurrent fistula-in-ano
after prior surgery using other recognized treatment
procedures. The median age was 41.5 (range, 27–56) years; median follow-up, 9 (range, 2–16) months. Primary healing was achieved in 37 patients (82.2%), with a median healing time of 7 (range, 4–10) weeks. Eight patients (17.7%) had recurrence of fistula between 3 and 8 months after the operation. No clinically significant morbidity was noted in any of the 45 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract technique for fistula-in-ano surgery, which aims at total anal sphincter preservation, appears to be both safe and easy to perform, with encouraging early outcomes. |
format |
Article |
author |
Mohamed Sidek , Ahmad Shanwani Md Nor, Azmi Mohamed Kamil, Nil Amri |
author_facet |
Mohamed Sidek , Ahmad Shanwani Md Nor, Azmi Mohamed Kamil, Nil Amri |
author_sort |
Mohamed Sidek , Ahmad Shanwani |
title |
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
title_short |
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
title_full |
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
title_fullStr |
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
title_sort |
ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (lift): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano |
publisher |
Springer Verlag |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/14771/1/Ligation_of_the_Intersphincteric_Fistula_Tract_%28LIFT.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/14771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c160c4 |
_version_ |
1643606941342105600 |