Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan

This paper provides a comparative study of sustainable dispute management practices in Malaysia and Japan. With a focus on land-related disputes, the tangible and measurable objectives of the study include the identification of common trends in court-annexed dispute management in Malaysia and Japan;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi, Kadouf, Hunud Abia
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/1/Court-annexed_Dispute_Management_in_Land_Disputes_-_Malaysia_and_Japan.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/
http://iium.edu.my/kaed/events/joint-symposium-iium-toyo-university-call-papers-participations
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
Language: English
id my.iium.irep.27274
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.272742012-12-18T00:26:23Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/ Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi Kadouf, Hunud Abia K Law (General) This paper provides a comparative study of sustainable dispute management practices in Malaysia and Japan. With a focus on land-related disputes, the tangible and measurable objectives of the study include the identification of common trends in court-annexed dispute management in Malaysia and Japan; sustainable practices in court-annexed ADR that would engender prudent land management; the rate of out-of-court settlement in land disputes and its impact on the interest of the parties and ends of justice; and some unique trends the two countries can learn from each other to ensure a sustainable case management programme for land-related disputes. This study utilizes both the doctrinal research method and the empirical method for the Japanese and Malaysian aspects respectively to establish the common trends between the two jurisdictions. The study is expected to show that a comparative study on court-annexed dispute management between the two Asian countries can help in defining new directions in law reforms for sustainable land disputes management in the two jurisdictions. Such settlement would bring about mutual satisfaction among the disputing parties, avoidance of appeal backlogs, and foster a sustainable peace within the environment. 2012-11-15 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/1/Court-annexed_Dispute_Management_in_Land_Disputes_-_Malaysia_and_Japan.pdf Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi and Kadouf, Hunud Abia (2012) Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan. In: IIUM-Toyo University Joint Symposium, 15 November 2012, Tokyo, Japan. (Unpublished) http://iium.edu.my/kaed/events/joint-symposium-iium-toyo-university-call-papers-participations
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi
Kadouf, Hunud Abia
Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
description This paper provides a comparative study of sustainable dispute management practices in Malaysia and Japan. With a focus on land-related disputes, the tangible and measurable objectives of the study include the identification of common trends in court-annexed dispute management in Malaysia and Japan; sustainable practices in court-annexed ADR that would engender prudent land management; the rate of out-of-court settlement in land disputes and its impact on the interest of the parties and ends of justice; and some unique trends the two countries can learn from each other to ensure a sustainable case management programme for land-related disputes. This study utilizes both the doctrinal research method and the empirical method for the Japanese and Malaysian aspects respectively to establish the common trends between the two jurisdictions. The study is expected to show that a comparative study on court-annexed dispute management between the two Asian countries can help in defining new directions in law reforms for sustainable land disputes management in the two jurisdictions. Such settlement would bring about mutual satisfaction among the disputing parties, avoidance of appeal backlogs, and foster a sustainable peace within the environment.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi
Kadouf, Hunud Abia
author_facet Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi
Kadouf, Hunud Abia
author_sort Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi
title Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_short Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_full Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_fullStr Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_sort comparative dispute management in land disputes: court-annexed adr in malaysia and japan
publishDate 2012
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/1/Court-annexed_Dispute_Management_in_Land_Disputes_-_Malaysia_and_Japan.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/
http://iium.edu.my/kaed/events/joint-symposium-iium-toyo-university-call-papers-participations
_version_ 1643609306718797824