The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis
Strategic information systems planning (SISP) is an exercise or ongoing activity that enables organisations to develop priorities for information systems development. It has been suggested that the ‘SISP approach’, a combination of method, process and implementation, is the most complete way of d...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
1999
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/38528/4/drAdam_the_relative.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/38528/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09638687/8/3 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.iium.irep.38528 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.385282014-10-01T03:34:12Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/38528/ The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis Doherty, Neil. F Marples, Chris. G Suhaimi, Mohd Adam T58.6 Management information systems Strategic information systems planning (SISP) is an exercise or ongoing activity that enables organisations to develop priorities for information systems development. It has been suggested that the ‘SISP approach’, a combination of method, process and implementation, is the most complete way of describing SISP activity. Based upon questionnaire responses from 267 IT Directors, four distinct approaches to SISP have been derived using cluster analysis. A comparison of these four approaches with five approaches of Earl, M.J., 1993. Experiences in SISP, MIS Quarterly, (March), 1–24, indicates that three bear strong similarities to the ‘organisational’, ‘business-led’, and ‘administrative’ approaches, whilst the fourth cluster is related to both Earl’s ‘method-driven’ and ‘technological’ approaches. An analysis of the relationship between SISP approach and SISP success demonstrates that the ‘organisational approach’ is significantly more successful than the other three approaches. q 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Elsevier 1999 Article REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/38528/4/drAdam_the_relative.pdf Doherty, Neil. F and Marples, Chris. G and Suhaimi, Mohd Adam (1999) The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8 (3). pp. 263-283. ISSN 0963-8687 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09638687/8/3 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
T58.6 Management information systems |
spellingShingle |
T58.6 Management information systems Doherty, Neil. F Marples, Chris. G Suhaimi, Mohd Adam The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
description |
Strategic information systems planning (SISP) is an exercise or ongoing activity that enables
organisations to develop priorities for information systems development. It has been suggested that
the ‘SISP approach’, a combination of method, process and implementation, is the most complete
way of describing SISP activity. Based upon questionnaire responses from 267 IT Directors, four
distinct approaches to SISP have been derived using cluster analysis. A comparison of these four
approaches with five approaches of Earl, M.J., 1993. Experiences in SISP, MIS Quarterly, (March),
1–24, indicates that three bear strong similarities to the ‘organisational’, ‘business-led’, and
‘administrative’ approaches, whilst the fourth cluster is related to both Earl’s ‘method-driven’ and
‘technological’ approaches. An analysis of the relationship between SISP approach and SISP success
demonstrates that the ‘organisational approach’ is significantly more successful than the other three
approaches. q 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. |
format |
Article |
author |
Doherty, Neil. F Marples, Chris. G Suhaimi, Mohd Adam |
author_facet |
Doherty, Neil. F Marples, Chris. G Suhaimi, Mohd Adam |
author_sort |
Doherty, Neil. F |
title |
The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
title_short |
The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
title_full |
The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
title_fullStr |
The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
title_sort |
relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems: an empirical analysis |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
1999 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38528/4/drAdam_the_relative.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/38528/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09638687/8/3 |
_version_ |
1643611444418183168 |