Parliamentary behaviour of the members of opposition political parties in Malaysia
In a hegemonic consociational system practised in Malaysia, the Opposition can hardly play a dominant role in making democracy work. Nevertheless, a content analysis of the debates in the House of Representatives from 1982 to 2003 show that the opposition members have contributed to the process...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IIUM Press
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/39473/1/parliamentary_behaviour.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/39473/ http://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/islam |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | In a hegemonic consociational system practised in Malaysia, the
Opposition can hardly play a dominant role in making democracy work.
Nevertheless, a content analysis of the debates in the House of Representatives
from 1982 to 2003 show that the opposition members have contributed to the
process of check and balance in the government by asking questions to relevant
ministries and by initiating adjournment motions. In the process, they not
merely attacked the government for their failure but also suggested alternative
policies some of which were implemented by the ruling coalition |
|---|