Use of complementary and alternative medicine among osteoarthritic patients: a review

• Main Authors: Khan, Muhammad Umair, Jamshed, Shazia, Akram, Ahmad, Mohd Ashraf, Ahmad Bidin, Siddiqui, Mohammad Jamshed Ahmad, Al-Shami, Abdul Kareem
• Format: Article
• Language: English; English; English
• Published: JCDR Research and Publications (P) Limited 2016
• Subjects: RS Pharmacy and materia medica
• Online Access: http://irep.iium.edu.my/50792/9/50792_Use%20of%20complementary_text.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/50792/10/50792_Use%20of%20complementary_WOS.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/50792/11/50792_Use%20of%20complementary_SCOPUS.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/50792/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800547/pdf/jcdr-10-JE01.pdf
• Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia

INTRODUCTION: One of the most important indications of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) is in arthritis. The popularity of CAM in arthritis is consistently on the rise because of the potential side effects of the conventional therapy (Methotrexate) of arthritis. In view of this, it was important to summarize the information, for healthcare professionals and the patients, about the safety and effectiveness of various CAM use in arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This comprehensive review is based on the content derived through a thorough literature search using 5 electronic databases such as Science direct, Springer link, PubMed, Jet P and Google scholar. Equivalent terms in thesauruses or Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) browsers were used whenever possible. We included all the articles those are used CAM medications for the treatment of arthritis around the globe and searched for the required articles published in English in peer reviewed journals from January 1999 to February 2014. Reports were then arranged and analysed on the basis of country specific studies. RESULTS: Initially, a total of 156 articles were retrieved, after further screening, 27 articles were selected according to meet objectives of the study and those articles which did not qualify, were excluded. Seventeen appropriate studies were finally included in the review. Indeed most of the studies that fulfilled the objective of this review were carried out in US (n=8, 47%), then in India (n=2, 11.76%), UK (n=1, 5.88%), Canada (n=1, 5.88%), Australia (n=1, 5.88%), Korea (n=1, 5.88%), Thailand (n=1, 5.88%), Turkey (n=1, 5.88%) and Malaysia (n=1, 5.88%). CONCLUSION: The review revealed that family, friend, past experiences and lack of effectiveness of conventional therapy are the major factors that influenced patients' decision of initiating and persisting with CAM therapy. The review highlighted the need to conduct future studies by using some more specific health related outcome measures.