A comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
The tyranny of the majority against the rights of the minority is warded off by constitutional safeguards enforced primarily by the court. This is one of the reasons why Malaysia and Indonesia adopt the doctrine of constitutional supremacy when they achieved independence in 1957 and in 1945 respecti...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
Universiti Putra Malaysia
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/1/JSSH%28S%29-0538-2017%20%28ACCEPTANCE%20LETTER%29%2017.8.2018%20%281%29.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/9/62225_A%20Comparison%20of%20Constitutional%20Adjudication_article.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/15/62225_A%20comparison%20of%20constitutional%20adjudication%20institutions%20in%20Malaysia%20and%20Indonesia_scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/ http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/index.php |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English English English |
Internet
http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/1/JSSH%28S%29-0538-2017%20%28ACCEPTANCE%20LETTER%29%2017.8.2018%20%281%29.pdfhttp://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/9/62225_A%20Comparison%20of%20Constitutional%20Adjudication_article.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/15/62225_A%20comparison%20of%20constitutional%20adjudication%20institutions%20in%20Malaysia%20and%20Indonesia_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/
http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/index.php