GDP vs genuine progress quantification of economic performance in South Korea and Malaysia
Malaysia and South Korea, successful graduates of Asian Financial Crisis, employed different paths to recovery via Capital Control and IMF bail-out respectively. This paper tracks recovery trajectories of the two nations via orthodox and emergent growth indicators: GDP and GPI. We report unemploymen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Oviedo University Press
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/68820/1/68820_GDP%20vs%20genuine%20progress%20quantification.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/68820/2/68820_GDP%20vs%20genuine%20progress%20quantification_SCOPUS.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/68820/ https://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/EBL/article/view/12779/11951 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
| Language: | English English |
| Summary: | Malaysia and South Korea, successful graduates of Asian Financial Crisis, employed different paths to recovery via Capital Control and IMF bail-out respectively. This paper tracks recovery trajectories of the two nations via orthodox and emergent growth indicators: GDP and GPI. We report unemployment, open-trade, fixed capital accumulation, and prior crisis to be influential determinants of both metrics, while credit and foreign exchange rate lack significance. |
|---|