Performance of ad hoc routing protocols in mobile WiMAX environment
Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) is a technology that bridges the gap between fixed and mobile access and offer the same subscriber experience for fixed and mobile user. Demand for such type of mobile broadband services and applications are growing rapidly as it provides fr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/8168/1/Performance_of_ad_hoc_routing_protocols_in_mobile_WiMAX_environment.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/8168/ http://www.springerlink.com/content/r06hlu4q29j72412/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) is a
technology that bridges the gap between fixed and mobile access and offer the same
subscriber experience for fixed and mobile user. Demand for such type of mobile
broadband services and applications are growing rapidly as it provides freedom to
the subscribers to be online wherever they are at a competitive price with other
significant facilities such as increasing amounts of bandwidth, using a variety of
mobile and nomadic devices etc. The earliest version of WiMAX is based on IEEE
802.16 and is optimized for fixed and nomadic access, which is further extended
to support portability and mobility based on IEEE 802.16e, also known as Mobile
WiMAX. However, frequent topology changes caused by node mobility make routing
in Mobile WiMAX networks a challenging problem. In this study, we focus
upon those routing protocols especially designed for wireless networks. Here, we
compare the performance of four ad hoc routing protocols (AODV, DSR, OLSR
and ZRP) for Mobile WiMAX environment under the assumption that each of the
subscriber station has routing capabilities within its own network. From our simulation,
we found that ZRP and AODV protocols outperform DSR and OLSR. |
|---|