Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing

Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing more interesting. It is taken more seriously when it comes to assessment, compared to teaching. Students seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to teach (Saddler, 2007)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah, Liza, Jusoh, Zailani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/1/81863_Validating%20Content%20of%20Sentence%20Variety.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/
http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Validating_Content_of_Sentence_Variety_Checklist_for_ESL_Writing.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3164
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
Language: English
id my.iium.irep.81863
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.818632020-07-24T08:02:14Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/ Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing Abdullah, Liza Jusoh, Zailani PE English Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing more interesting. It is taken more seriously when it comes to assessment, compared to teaching. Students seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to teach (Saddler, 2007). With the intervention of sentence variety checklist (SVC) to promote sentence variety, this study investigated the validity of items in the SVC adapted from Langan (1993) to be justified, prior to its use in the ESL writing classroom. Five ESL teachers who are the writing experts and have been teaching writing for more than 15 years in a public university in Malaysia responded to the questionnaire of 14 items rephrased from the items in the checklist and one open-ended question for further suggestions. The data were analysed by computing Content Validity Index (CVI) using ratings of content item relevance by the writing experts. The results revealed that out of 14 items, 12 items were rated as highly relevant while the other two were still relevant. In addition, passive voice appeared to be another item suggested to be included in the checklist in the efforts to boost students’ writing performance. Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS) 2017 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/1/81863_Validating%20Content%20of%20Sentence%20Variety.pdf Abdullah, Liza and Jusoh, Zailani (2017) Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6 (3). pp. 119-128. ISSN 2226-6348 http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Validating_Content_of_Sentence_Variety_Checklist_for_ESL_Writing.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3164
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic PE English
spellingShingle PE English
Abdullah, Liza
Jusoh, Zailani
Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
description Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing more interesting. It is taken more seriously when it comes to assessment, compared to teaching. Students seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to teach (Saddler, 2007). With the intervention of sentence variety checklist (SVC) to promote sentence variety, this study investigated the validity of items in the SVC adapted from Langan (1993) to be justified, prior to its use in the ESL writing classroom. Five ESL teachers who are the writing experts and have been teaching writing for more than 15 years in a public university in Malaysia responded to the questionnaire of 14 items rephrased from the items in the checklist and one open-ended question for further suggestions. The data were analysed by computing Content Validity Index (CVI) using ratings of content item relevance by the writing experts. The results revealed that out of 14 items, 12 items were rated as highly relevant while the other two were still relevant. In addition, passive voice appeared to be another item suggested to be included in the checklist in the efforts to boost students’ writing performance.
format Article
author Abdullah, Liza
Jusoh, Zailani
author_facet Abdullah, Liza
Jusoh, Zailani
author_sort Abdullah, Liza
title Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
title_short Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
title_full Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
title_fullStr Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
title_full_unstemmed Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
title_sort validating content of sentence variety checklist for esl writing
publisher Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS)
publishDate 2017
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/1/81863_Validating%20Content%20of%20Sentence%20Variety.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/
http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Validating_Content_of_Sentence_Variety_Checklist_for_ESL_Writing.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3164
_version_ 1674065965840596992