Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing
Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing more interesting. It is taken more seriously when it comes to assessment, compared to teaching. Students seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to teach (Saddler, 2007)....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS)
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/1/81863_Validating%20Content%20of%20Sentence%20Variety.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/ http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Validating_Content_of_Sentence_Variety_Checklist_for_ESL_Writing.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3164 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.iium.irep.81863 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.818632020-07-24T08:02:14Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/ Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing Abdullah, Liza Jusoh, Zailani PE English Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing more interesting. It is taken more seriously when it comes to assessment, compared to teaching. Students seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to teach (Saddler, 2007). With the intervention of sentence variety checklist (SVC) to promote sentence variety, this study investigated the validity of items in the SVC adapted from Langan (1993) to be justified, prior to its use in the ESL writing classroom. Five ESL teachers who are the writing experts and have been teaching writing for more than 15 years in a public university in Malaysia responded to the questionnaire of 14 items rephrased from the items in the checklist and one open-ended question for further suggestions. The data were analysed by computing Content Validity Index (CVI) using ratings of content item relevance by the writing experts. The results revealed that out of 14 items, 12 items were rated as highly relevant while the other two were still relevant. In addition, passive voice appeared to be another item suggested to be included in the checklist in the efforts to boost students’ writing performance. Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS) 2017 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/1/81863_Validating%20Content%20of%20Sentence%20Variety.pdf Abdullah, Liza and Jusoh, Zailani (2017) Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6 (3). pp. 119-128. ISSN 2226-6348 http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Validating_Content_of_Sentence_Variety_Checklist_for_ESL_Writing.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3164 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
PE English |
spellingShingle |
PE English Abdullah, Liza Jusoh, Zailani Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL writing |
description |
Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing
more interesting. It is taken more seriously when it comes to assessment, compared to
teaching. Students seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to
teach (Saddler, 2007). With the intervention of sentence variety checklist (SVC) to promote
sentence variety, this study investigated the validity of items in the SVC adapted from Langan
(1993) to be justified, prior to its use in the ESL writing classroom. Five ESL teachers who are the
writing experts and have been teaching writing for more than 15 years in a public university in
Malaysia responded to the questionnaire of 14 items rephrased from the items in the checklist
and one open-ended question for further suggestions. The data were analysed by computing
Content Validity Index (CVI) using ratings of content item relevance by the writing experts. The
results revealed that out of 14 items, 12 items were rated as highly relevant while the other
two were still relevant. In addition, passive voice appeared to be another item suggested to be
included in the checklist in the efforts to boost students’ writing performance. |
format |
Article |
author |
Abdullah, Liza Jusoh, Zailani |
author_facet |
Abdullah, Liza Jusoh, Zailani |
author_sort |
Abdullah, Liza |
title |
Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL
writing |
title_short |
Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL
writing |
title_full |
Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL
writing |
title_fullStr |
Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL
writing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validating content of sentence variety checklist for ESL
writing |
title_sort |
validating content of sentence variety checklist for esl
writing |
publisher |
Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS) |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/1/81863_Validating%20Content%20of%20Sentence%20Variety.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/81863/ http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Validating_Content_of_Sentence_Variety_Checklist_for_ESL_Writing.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3164 |
_version_ |
1674065965840596992 |