Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse

OBJECTIVE We describe a rare case of incarcerated, recurred rectal prolapse and was managed successfully with perineal proctosigmoidectomy. CASE REPORT A 71 year old woman with hypertension and parkinsonism underwent successful perineal stapled prolapse resection. Two months later she presented...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ismail, Fahmi, Sainal, Mohd. Yusof, Elagili, Faisal, Md Nor, Azmi
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/92680/1/92680_Altemeier%20Procedure%20%28Perineal%20Rectosigmoidectomy%29.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/92680/
http://colorectalmy.org/coloproctology2020/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
Language: English
id my.iium.irep.92680
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.926802021-10-13T00:54:50Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/92680/ Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse Ismail, Fahmi Sainal, Mohd. Yusof Elagili, Faisal Md Nor, Azmi RD Surgery OBJECTIVE We describe a rare case of incarcerated, recurred rectal prolapse and was managed successfully with perineal proctosigmoidectomy. CASE REPORT A 71 year old woman with hypertension and parkinsonism underwent successful perineal stapled prolapse resection. Two months later she presented with incarcerated recurrent rectal prolapse. On clinical examination, vital signs within normal limits. Her abdomen was not tender and had no signs of peritoneal irritation. Rectal examination revealed 10 cm incarcerated prolapsed rectum with markedly swollen, congested, and showed signs of superficial mucosal erosion and necrosis. Because of patient’s age, comorbidities, failure of external manual reduction and the appearance of established necrosis, we decided to proceed with perineal proctosigmoidectomy. The postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient discharged on the fourth day. Histopathological examination revealed necrosis of mucosa and submucosa in resected specimen. During subsequent clinic follow-up 3 months later noted no evidence of recurrent rectal prolapse. CONCLUSION Our patient successful treatment with perineal proctosigmoidectomy (Altemeier’s procedure), highlights the value of this procedure in debilitated elderly patient with incarcerated recurrent rectal prolapse. 2020-03-05 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/92680/1/92680_Altemeier%20Procedure%20%28Perineal%20Rectosigmoidectomy%29.pdf Ismail, Fahmi and Sainal, Mohd. Yusof and Elagili, Faisal and Md Nor, Azmi (2020) Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse. In: Coloproctology 2020, Weil Hotel, Ipoh. (Unpublished) http://colorectalmy.org/coloproctology2020/
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic RD Surgery
spellingShingle RD Surgery
Ismail, Fahmi
Sainal, Mohd. Yusof
Elagili, Faisal
Md Nor, Azmi
Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
description OBJECTIVE We describe a rare case of incarcerated, recurred rectal prolapse and was managed successfully with perineal proctosigmoidectomy. CASE REPORT A 71 year old woman with hypertension and parkinsonism underwent successful perineal stapled prolapse resection. Two months later she presented with incarcerated recurrent rectal prolapse. On clinical examination, vital signs within normal limits. Her abdomen was not tender and had no signs of peritoneal irritation. Rectal examination revealed 10 cm incarcerated prolapsed rectum with markedly swollen, congested, and showed signs of superficial mucosal erosion and necrosis. Because of patient’s age, comorbidities, failure of external manual reduction and the appearance of established necrosis, we decided to proceed with perineal proctosigmoidectomy. The postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient discharged on the fourth day. Histopathological examination revealed necrosis of mucosa and submucosa in resected specimen. During subsequent clinic follow-up 3 months later noted no evidence of recurrent rectal prolapse. CONCLUSION Our patient successful treatment with perineal proctosigmoidectomy (Altemeier’s procedure), highlights the value of this procedure in debilitated elderly patient with incarcerated recurrent rectal prolapse.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Ismail, Fahmi
Sainal, Mohd. Yusof
Elagili, Faisal
Md Nor, Azmi
author_facet Ismail, Fahmi
Sainal, Mohd. Yusof
Elagili, Faisal
Md Nor, Azmi
author_sort Ismail, Fahmi
title Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
title_short Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
title_full Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
title_fullStr Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy) for Incarcerated and 41 Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
title_sort altemeier procedure (perineal rectosigmoidectomy) for incarcerated and 41 recurrent rectal prolapse
publishDate 2020
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/92680/1/92680_Altemeier%20Procedure%20%28Perineal%20Rectosigmoidectomy%29.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/92680/
http://colorectalmy.org/coloproctology2020/
_version_ 1715189389098745856