Inclusion and affective well-being: Roles of justice perceptions

Purpose – This paper examines the mediating roles of procedural justice and distributive justice in the organizational inclusion–affective wellbeing relationship. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 253 Australian employees using an online survey. The study used confirmatory fact...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Le, Huong, Jiang, Zhou, Fujimoto, Yuka *, Nielsen, Ingrid
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: Emerald 2018
主題:
在線閱讀:http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/872/1/Fujimoto%20Inclusion%20and%20affective_Acceptedversion.pdf
http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/872/
http://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2017-0078
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Sunway University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:Purpose – This paper examines the mediating roles of procedural justice and distributive justice in the organizational inclusion–affective wellbeing relationship. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 253 Australian employees using an online survey. The study used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Findings – Organizational inclusion was positively related to both distributive justice and procedural justice. The relationship between organizational inclusion and affective wellbeing was mediated by both distributive justice and procedural justice. Research limitations/implications – The cross-sectional design may have limited the empirical inferences; however, the proposed model was based on robust theoretical contentions, thus mitigating the limitation of the design. Data were collected from a single organization, thus limiting generalizability. Practical implications – Implementation of inclusion training activities at organizational, group, and individual levels is important to enhance perceptions of organizational inclusion and subsequently improve employee affective wellbeing. Originality/value – Based on the group engagement model and group-value model of justice, this paper adds to the literature by demonstrating two mediating mechanisms driving the organizational inclusion–affective wellbeing relationship.