Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse

Sets of common features are essential assets to be reused in fulfilling specific needs in software product line methodology. In Requirements Reuse (RR), the extraction of software features from Software Requirement Specifications (SRS) is viable only to practitioners who have access to these softwar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bakar, N.H., Kasirun, Z.M., Salleh, N., Jalab, H.A.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/18443/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.048
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
id my.um.eprints.18443
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.184432019-02-07T09:19:39Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18443/ Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse Bakar, N.H. Kasirun, Z.M. Salleh, N. Jalab, H.A. QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science QA76 Computer software Sets of common features are essential assets to be reused in fulfilling specific needs in software product line methodology. In Requirements Reuse (RR), the extraction of software features from Software Requirement Specifications (SRS) is viable only to practitioners who have access to these software artefacts. Due to organisational privacy, SRS are always kept confidential and not easily available to the public. As alternatives, researchers opted to use the publicly available software descriptions such as product brochures and online software descriptions to identify potential software features to initiate the RR process. The aim of this paper is to propose a semi-automated approach, known as Feature Extraction for Reuse of Natural Language requirements (FENL), to extract phrases that can represent software features from software reviews in the absence of SRS as a way to initiate the RR process. FENL is composed of four stages, which depend on keyword occurrences from several combinations of nouns, verbs, and/or adjectives. In the experiment conducted, phrases that could reflect software features, which reside within online software reviews were extracted by utilising the techniques from information retrieval (IR) area. As a way to demonstrate the feature groupings phase, a semi-automated approach to group the extracted features were then conducted with the assistance of a modified word overlap algorithm. As for the evaluation, the proposed extraction approach is evaluated through experiments against the truth data set created manually. The performance results obtained from the feature extraction phase indicates that the proposed approach performed comparably with related works in terms of recall, precision, and F-Measure. Elsevier 2016 Article PeerReviewed Bakar, N.H. and Kasirun, Z.M. and Salleh, N. and Jalab, H.A. (2016) Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse. Applied Soft Computing, 49. pp. 1297-1315. ISSN 1568-4946 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.048 doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.048
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
QA76 Computer software
Bakar, N.H.
Kasirun, Z.M.
Salleh, N.
Jalab, H.A.
Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
description Sets of common features are essential assets to be reused in fulfilling specific needs in software product line methodology. In Requirements Reuse (RR), the extraction of software features from Software Requirement Specifications (SRS) is viable only to practitioners who have access to these software artefacts. Due to organisational privacy, SRS are always kept confidential and not easily available to the public. As alternatives, researchers opted to use the publicly available software descriptions such as product brochures and online software descriptions to identify potential software features to initiate the RR process. The aim of this paper is to propose a semi-automated approach, known as Feature Extraction for Reuse of Natural Language requirements (FENL), to extract phrases that can represent software features from software reviews in the absence of SRS as a way to initiate the RR process. FENL is composed of four stages, which depend on keyword occurrences from several combinations of nouns, verbs, and/or adjectives. In the experiment conducted, phrases that could reflect software features, which reside within online software reviews were extracted by utilising the techniques from information retrieval (IR) area. As a way to demonstrate the feature groupings phase, a semi-automated approach to group the extracted features were then conducted with the assistance of a modified word overlap algorithm. As for the evaluation, the proposed extraction approach is evaluated through experiments against the truth data set created manually. The performance results obtained from the feature extraction phase indicates that the proposed approach performed comparably with related works in terms of recall, precision, and F-Measure.
format Article
author Bakar, N.H.
Kasirun, Z.M.
Salleh, N.
Jalab, H.A.
author_facet Bakar, N.H.
Kasirun, Z.M.
Salleh, N.
Jalab, H.A.
author_sort Bakar, N.H.
title Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
title_short Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
title_full Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
title_fullStr Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
title_full_unstemmed Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
title_sort extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/18443/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.048
_version_ 1643690707353862144