Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis
Feedback can be used as an effective teaching method in physical education (PE) to promote students' learning of motor skills. However, there is no objective synthetic evidence to support the role of feedback in PE. Additionally, the effect of each feedback subtype on students' motor skill...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
MDPI
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/40599/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaya |
id |
my.um.eprints.40599 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.um.eprints.405992023-10-24T03:41:44Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/40599/ Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis Han, Yankun Syed Ali, Syed Kamaruzaman Ji, Lifu BF Psychology Feedback can be used as an effective teaching method in physical education (PE) to promote students' learning of motor skills. However, there is no objective synthetic evidence to support the role of feedback in PE. Additionally, the effect of each feedback subtype on students' motor skill learning is still unclear. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the effects of feedback and feedback subtypes on students' motor skill learning. Nine databases were searched through September 2022 to identify appropriate literature. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software and TSA was performed using TSA version 0.9.5.10 beta software. Fifteen studies were included. Feedback significantly improved students' motor skill learning in PE (SMD 0.47; 95% CI 0.01, 0.93; Z = 2.02; p = 0.04). The TSA confirmed the result of the meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses showed that the subtypes of feedback, including visual feedback, visual combined verbal feedback, visual self-model, visual expert model, corrective feedback, and teacher-regulated feedback, significantly improved students' learning of motor skills. In contrast, verbal, evaluative, and informational feedback did not produce changes in motor skill learning. Both complex and simple motor skills were improved by feedback. The use of feedback in PE benefits motor skill learning, regardless of whether the motor skills are complex or simple. MDPI 2022-11 Article PeerReviewed Han, Yankun and Syed Ali, Syed Kamaruzaman and Ji, Lifu (2022) Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (22). ISSN 1660-4601, DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215361 <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215361>. 10.3390/ijerph192215361 |
institution |
Universiti Malaya |
building |
UM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
content_source |
UM Research Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
topic |
BF Psychology |
spellingShingle |
BF Psychology Han, Yankun Syed Ali, Syed Kamaruzaman Ji, Lifu Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis |
description |
Feedback can be used as an effective teaching method in physical education (PE) to promote students' learning of motor skills. However, there is no objective synthetic evidence to support the role of feedback in PE. Additionally, the effect of each feedback subtype on students' motor skill learning is still unclear. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the effects of feedback and feedback subtypes on students' motor skill learning. Nine databases were searched through September 2022 to identify appropriate literature. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software and TSA was performed using TSA version 0.9.5.10 beta software. Fifteen studies were included. Feedback significantly improved students' motor skill learning in PE (SMD 0.47; 95% CI 0.01, 0.93; Z = 2.02; p = 0.04). The TSA confirmed the result of the meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses showed that the subtypes of feedback, including visual feedback, visual combined verbal feedback, visual self-model, visual expert model, corrective feedback, and teacher-regulated feedback, significantly improved students' learning of motor skills. In contrast, verbal, evaluative, and informational feedback did not produce changes in motor skill learning. Both complex and simple motor skills were improved by feedback. The use of feedback in PE benefits motor skill learning, regardless of whether the motor skills are complex or simple. |
format |
Article |
author |
Han, Yankun Syed Ali, Syed Kamaruzaman Ji, Lifu |
author_facet |
Han, Yankun Syed Ali, Syed Kamaruzaman Ji, Lifu |
author_sort |
Han, Yankun |
title |
Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis |
title_short |
Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis |
title_full |
Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: A trial sequential meta-analysis |
title_sort |
feedback for promoting motor skill learning in physical education: a trial sequential meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/40599/ |
_version_ |
1781704521514221568 |