End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology

Objective: End-of-life care is often overlooked in the dialysis unit despite high mortality rates. This study aimed to understand the diverse subjectivity of opinions on end-of-life care preferences, feelings, needs, value and goals in life among a haemodialysis population.Methods: The Q methodology...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maniam, Radha, Tan, Maw Pin, Chong, Mei Chan
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/41980/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
id my.um.eprints.41980
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.419802023-10-17T09:15:45Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/41980/ End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology Maniam, Radha Tan, Maw Pin Chong, Mei Chan RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine Objective: End-of-life care is often overlooked in the dialysis unit despite high mortality rates. This study aimed to understand the diverse subjectivity of opinions on end-of-life care preferences, feelings, needs, value and goals in life among a haemodialysis population.Methods: The Q methodology was used where 37 opinion statements were ranked in order of importance in a unimodal shaped grid. Results were explored using the Centroids factor extraction and Varimax rotation. Results: Four-three persons living with haemodialysis, mean age +/- SD= 56.58 +/- 10.22 years, participated in the study. Five-factors were identified: living in the present, family preference, self preservation, power vs. control and autonomy in decision making, loaded by eleven, four, four, three and three participants with 16 individuals not loading significantly and two were confounded. Preferences for remaining positive in the face of illness through a healthy lifestyle and preserving relationships and autonomy were demonstrated.Conclusions: End-of-life discussions are potentially inhibited by preferences to live for the present which should be explored in future studies. Practice implication: Statement sets may be used to help facilitate end-of-life discussions through identification of opinion groups. Establishing preferences may guide identification of those willing to initiate discussions.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2022-06 Article PeerReviewed Maniam, Radha and Tan, Maw Pin and Chong, Mei Chan (2022) End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology. Patient Education and Counseling, 105 (6). pp. 1495-1502. ISSN 0738-3991, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.026 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.026>. 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.026
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
spellingShingle RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Maniam, Radha
Tan, Maw Pin
Chong, Mei Chan
End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology
description Objective: End-of-life care is often overlooked in the dialysis unit despite high mortality rates. This study aimed to understand the diverse subjectivity of opinions on end-of-life care preferences, feelings, needs, value and goals in life among a haemodialysis population.Methods: The Q methodology was used where 37 opinion statements were ranked in order of importance in a unimodal shaped grid. Results were explored using the Centroids factor extraction and Varimax rotation. Results: Four-three persons living with haemodialysis, mean age +/- SD= 56.58 +/- 10.22 years, participated in the study. Five-factors were identified: living in the present, family preference, self preservation, power vs. control and autonomy in decision making, loaded by eleven, four, four, three and three participants with 16 individuals not loading significantly and two were confounded. Preferences for remaining positive in the face of illness through a healthy lifestyle and preserving relationships and autonomy were demonstrated.Conclusions: End-of-life discussions are potentially inhibited by preferences to live for the present which should be explored in future studies. Practice implication: Statement sets may be used to help facilitate end-of-life discussions through identification of opinion groups. Establishing preferences may guide identification of those willing to initiate discussions.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Maniam, Radha
Tan, Maw Pin
Chong, Mei Chan
author_facet Maniam, Radha
Tan, Maw Pin
Chong, Mei Chan
author_sort Maniam, Radha
title End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology
title_short End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology
title_full End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology
title_fullStr End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology
title_full_unstemmed End of life care preference among hemodialysis population: Revisit Q methodology
title_sort end of life care preference among hemodialysis population: revisit q methodology
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/41980/
_version_ 1781704578715090944