Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers

Linguistically, interactive metadiscourse devices are responsible for creating an unfolding and persuasive piece of writing. They help writers come up with a cohesive and reader-friendly text and highlight how they control the interactive meaning. This corpus-driven study is an attempt to explore th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khedri, Mohsen, Basirat, Elham
Format: Article
Published: Masaryk University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/44068/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
id my.um.eprints.44068
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.440682023-12-01T03:42:07Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/44068/ Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers Khedri, Mohsen Basirat, Elham L Education (General) P Philology. Linguistics Linguistically, interactive metadiscourse devices are responsible for creating an unfolding and persuasive piece of writing. They help writers come up with a cohesive and reader-friendly text and highlight how they control the interactive meaning. This corpus-driven study is an attempt to explore the use of interactive metadiscourse markers in English dentistry research articles published in International ISI-indexed and Iranian local research-based journals. The aim was to see if interactive resources, as realized by rhetorical options, such as transitions, code glosses, endophoric markers, evidentials, and frame markers, are predisposed to discipline-specific rhetorical conventions. To this end, fourty dentistry research articles were analyzed using Hyland’s (2005) Interpersonal Model of Metadiscourse. The results disclosed similarities and differences in both the frequency and use of interactive resources between the two sets of research articles. The present results are expected to extend our understanding of authorial preferences for the use of metadiscourse markers in tandem with discourse functions in research articles in the selected discipline. The results of such studies may also improve different features of language pedagogy, such as teaching and learning academic writing, namely research articles. © 2022 Masaryk University. All rights reserved. Masaryk University 2022 Article PeerReviewed Khedri, Mohsen and Basirat, Elham (2022) Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers. Discourse and Interaction, 15 (2). 77 -100. ISSN 18029930, DOI https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-2-77 <https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-2-77>. 10.5817/DI2022-2-77
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic L Education (General)
P Philology. Linguistics
spellingShingle L Education (General)
P Philology. Linguistics
Khedri, Mohsen
Basirat, Elham
Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers
description Linguistically, interactive metadiscourse devices are responsible for creating an unfolding and persuasive piece of writing. They help writers come up with a cohesive and reader-friendly text and highlight how they control the interactive meaning. This corpus-driven study is an attempt to explore the use of interactive metadiscourse markers in English dentistry research articles published in International ISI-indexed and Iranian local research-based journals. The aim was to see if interactive resources, as realized by rhetorical options, such as transitions, code glosses, endophoric markers, evidentials, and frame markers, are predisposed to discipline-specific rhetorical conventions. To this end, fourty dentistry research articles were analyzed using Hyland’s (2005) Interpersonal Model of Metadiscourse. The results disclosed similarities and differences in both the frequency and use of interactive resources between the two sets of research articles. The present results are expected to extend our understanding of authorial preferences for the use of metadiscourse markers in tandem with discourse functions in research articles in the selected discipline. The results of such studies may also improve different features of language pedagogy, such as teaching and learning academic writing, namely research articles. © 2022 Masaryk University. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Khedri, Mohsen
Basirat, Elham
author_facet Khedri, Mohsen
Basirat, Elham
author_sort Khedri, Mohsen
title Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers
title_short Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers
title_full Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers
title_fullStr Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers
title_full_unstemmed Interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: Iranian vs non-Iranian academic writers
title_sort interactive metadiscourse in dentistry research articles: iranian vs non-iranian academic writers
publisher Masaryk University
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/44068/
_version_ 1784511898915438592