Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly

OBJECTIVE To compare same -sitting bilateral vs unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients, focusing on postoperative complications and stone -free rates (SFR). METHODS Data from 2 multicenter databases, FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR) (unilateral RIRS) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chai, Chu Ann, Somani, Bhaskar, Castellani, Daniele, Fong, Khi Yung, Sarica, Kemal, Emiliani, Estaban, Ong, William Lay Keat, Ragoori, Deepak, Goekce, Mehmet Ilker, Gadzhiev, Nariman, Tanidir, Yiloren, Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine, Inoue, Takaaki, Pirola, Giacomo Maria, Teoh, Jeremy Yuen -Chun, Bin Hamri, Saeed, Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N., Ganpule, Arvind, Chew, Ben Hall, Traxer, Olivier, Gauhar, Vineet
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/45348/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
id my.um.eprints.45348
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.453482024-10-14T07:36:10Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/45348/ Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly Chai, Chu Ann Somani, Bhaskar Castellani, Daniele Fong, Khi Yung Sarica, Kemal Emiliani, Estaban Ong, William Lay Keat Ragoori, Deepak Goekce, Mehmet Ilker Gadzhiev, Nariman Tanidir, Yiloren Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine Inoue, Takaaki Pirola, Giacomo Maria Teoh, Jeremy Yuen -Chun Bin Hamri, Saeed Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N. Ganpule, Arvind Chew, Ben Hall Traxer, Olivier Gauhar, Vineet R Medicine OBJECTIVE To compare same -sitting bilateral vs unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients, focusing on postoperative complications and stone -free rates (SFR). METHODS Data from 2 multicenter databases, FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR) (unilateral RIRS) and same sitting bilateral -retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) (bilateral RIRS), were analyzed, considering only patients aged 70+ with preoperative computed tomography. Patients were categorized into Group 1 (bilateral RIRS) and Group 2 (unilateral RIRS). Follow-up included imaging assessments and secondary treatments as needed. RESULTS Group 1 included 146 patients, while group 2 had 495. Group 1's patients were slightly older and had a higher prevalence of recurrent stone formation. Group 2 often underwent RIRS for incidental stones. Group 1 had larger and more pelvic stones. Laser lithotripsy and total operation times were significantly longer in Group 1. Group 2 had significantly higher overall stone -free rates, although there were no significant differences in ancillary procedures for residual fragments. Group 1 experienced more pelvicalyceal injuries needing stenting, postoperative fever, and post -op hematuria not requiring transfusion. CONCLUSION In conclusion, bilateral RIRS can be carefully considered in elderly patients. Preoperative counseling is essential for both primary and repeat RIRS procedures, and further research is needed to optimize instrument and laser strategies for better outcomes in elderly RIRS patients. UROLOGY 186: 117-122, 2024. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Elsevier 2024-04 Article PeerReviewed Chai, Chu Ann and Somani, Bhaskar and Castellani, Daniele and Fong, Khi Yung and Sarica, Kemal and Emiliani, Estaban and Ong, William Lay Keat and Ragoori, Deepak and Goekce, Mehmet Ilker and Gadzhiev, Nariman and Tanidir, Yiloren and Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine and Inoue, Takaaki and Pirola, Giacomo Maria and Teoh, Jeremy Yuen -Chun and Bin Hamri, Saeed and Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N. and Ganpule, Arvind and Chew, Ben Hall and Traxer, Olivier and Gauhar, Vineet (2024) Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly. Urology, 186. pp. 117-122. ISSN 0090-4295, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Chai, Chu Ann
Somani, Bhaskar
Castellani, Daniele
Fong, Khi Yung
Sarica, Kemal
Emiliani, Estaban
Ong, William Lay Keat
Ragoori, Deepak
Goekce, Mehmet Ilker
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Tanidir, Yiloren
Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine
Inoue, Takaaki
Pirola, Giacomo Maria
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen -Chun
Bin Hamri, Saeed
Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
Ganpule, Arvind
Chew, Ben Hall
Traxer, Olivier
Gauhar, Vineet
Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly
description OBJECTIVE To compare same -sitting bilateral vs unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients, focusing on postoperative complications and stone -free rates (SFR). METHODS Data from 2 multicenter databases, FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR) (unilateral RIRS) and same sitting bilateral -retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) (bilateral RIRS), were analyzed, considering only patients aged 70+ with preoperative computed tomography. Patients were categorized into Group 1 (bilateral RIRS) and Group 2 (unilateral RIRS). Follow-up included imaging assessments and secondary treatments as needed. RESULTS Group 1 included 146 patients, while group 2 had 495. Group 1's patients were slightly older and had a higher prevalence of recurrent stone formation. Group 2 often underwent RIRS for incidental stones. Group 1 had larger and more pelvic stones. Laser lithotripsy and total operation times were significantly longer in Group 1. Group 2 had significantly higher overall stone -free rates, although there were no significant differences in ancillary procedures for residual fragments. Group 1 experienced more pelvicalyceal injuries needing stenting, postoperative fever, and post -op hematuria not requiring transfusion. CONCLUSION In conclusion, bilateral RIRS can be carefully considered in elderly patients. Preoperative counseling is essential for both primary and repeat RIRS procedures, and further research is needed to optimize instrument and laser strategies for better outcomes in elderly RIRS patients. UROLOGY 186: 117-122, 2024. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Chai, Chu Ann
Somani, Bhaskar
Castellani, Daniele
Fong, Khi Yung
Sarica, Kemal
Emiliani, Estaban
Ong, William Lay Keat
Ragoori, Deepak
Goekce, Mehmet Ilker
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Tanidir, Yiloren
Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine
Inoue, Takaaki
Pirola, Giacomo Maria
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen -Chun
Bin Hamri, Saeed
Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
Ganpule, Arvind
Chew, Ben Hall
Traxer, Olivier
Gauhar, Vineet
author_facet Chai, Chu Ann
Somani, Bhaskar
Castellani, Daniele
Fong, Khi Yung
Sarica, Kemal
Emiliani, Estaban
Ong, William Lay Keat
Ragoori, Deepak
Goekce, Mehmet Ilker
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Tanidir, Yiloren
Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine
Inoue, Takaaki
Pirola, Giacomo Maria
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen -Chun
Bin Hamri, Saeed
Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
Ganpule, Arvind
Chew, Ben Hall
Traxer, Olivier
Gauhar, Vineet
author_sort Chai, Chu Ann
title Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly
title_short Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly
title_full Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly
title_fullStr Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly
title_sort comparing same-sitting bilateral vs unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery in the elderly
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2024
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/45348/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031
_version_ 1814047544964022272