Azobenzene-Imidazolium ionic liquid crystals: Phase properties and photoisomerization in solution state

This is the first report of phase properties and photoisomerization behaviour of a series of amphiphilic azobenzene-imidazolium derivatives. The cationic imidazolium moiety was functionalised with varying alkyl chain length (C10-C18) and connected to an azobenzene via a flexible ether spacer. Their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babamale, Halimah Funmilayo, Ng, Si Ling, Tang, Wai Kit, Yam, WanSinn
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/45725/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.137494
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
Description
Summary:This is the first report of phase properties and photoisomerization behaviour of a series of amphiphilic azobenzene-imidazolium derivatives. The cationic imidazolium moiety was functionalised with varying alkyl chain length (C10-C18) and connected to an azobenzene via a flexible ether spacer. Their phase transitional properties and photoisomerization in solution were modulated by the alkyl chains in the imidazolium moiety. C14 was the shortest chain length to induce the formation of a liquid crystal phase, wherein compounds having C14-C18 exhibited stable smectic A phase. All compounds photo switched from trans-to-cis isomers in solution when illuminated with UV radiation. DFT calculations revealed that the trans isomers could adopt two geometries, however, folded geometry (global minima) was thermodynamically more stable than the open chain structure. The long conjugate (C16) had a higher trans-cis isomerization barrier due to the multilayer folding geometry that reduced its structural flexibility as compared to the C10 homologue. The photo conversion efficiency (CE) was alkyl chain length dependent. The C10 salt had a larger CE than C16 homologue due to the transition gap between S1 excited state and ground surface is smaller in the former (0.211 eV) than that in the latter (0.278 eV), thus resulting in efficient photoisomerization in the former.