The financial and welfare impact of household tobacco expenditure in Malaysia / Tan Wei Leong
The tobacco epidemic is a public health threat in Malaysia and around the world. This project is mainly motivated by concerns about the non-health financial and welfare impact of tobacco-smoking on tobacco smokers and their households. Household tobacco expenditure was examined using data from fi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11496/4/wei_leong.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11496/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaya |
Summary: | The tobacco epidemic is a public health threat in Malaysia and around the world. This
project is mainly motivated by concerns about the non-health financial and welfare
impact of tobacco-smoking on tobacco smokers and their households. Household tobacco
expenditure was examined using data from five comparable nationally representative
Household Expenditures Surveys conducted in 1993, 1998, 2004, 2009 and 2014. First
part of the study estimated the household tobacco expenditure and the household tobacco
expenditure share across the various living standards and the distribution of tobacco
expenditure in Malaysia. The study revealed that the burden of tobacco-smoking in the
country has remained persistently high whereby the proportion of tobacco expenditure at
household level has always been above 35.0% over five points of time and that the middle
quintile has gradually emerged as the highest consumer of tobacco between 2004 and
2014. The proportion of households with tobacco expenditure was declining between
1993 and 2009 across all consumption quintiles but resurged in 2014. Although the
burden of tobacco-smoking was high, the monthly per capita adult equivalent tobacco
expenditure was relatively low among tobacco-smoking households, ranging from
MYR39.51 to MYR52.40. In addition, the household tobacco expenditure share of total
household expenditures had reduced from 7.00% to 4.60%, which indicates that there has
been a reduction in the amount of money spent for the purchase of tobacco products.
From concentration curves and indices, the household tobacco expenditure is more
concentrated among the richest quintile of the Malaysia population irrespective of region,
urban-rural stratum and ethnicity. The second part of the study estimated the
impoverishment attributable to direct tobacco expenditure in Malaysian households, as
based on an increase in the estimate of the poverty headcount. While overall, there was
iv
impoverishment due to direct tobacco expenditure; the proportion was very small and
declined from 1.08% in 1993 to 0.01% in 2014 irrespective of regions, urban-rural
stratum and ethnicity. The third part of the study estimated the crowding out of essential
goods and services due to tobacco expenditure. The crowding out effect was analysed
using one of the consumer demand models, namely the Quadratic Almost Ideal System
(QUAIDs). In addition, seemingly unrelated regression was used to estimate the crowding
out effect on five expenditures groups simultaneously as each of the expenditures groups
affects the others. The analysis showed that the crowding out of essential goods and
services was present but very modest among tobacco-smoking households in Malaysia,
where the tobacco-smoking households significantly reduce their expenditures on
food(1.64% less), education(0.47% less), medical care(0.35% less), housing(1.88% less)
and clothing(0.20% less) compared to non-smoking households. This observation was
rather consistent across all consumption expenditures quintiles irrespective of living
standards. Additionally, sub-population analysis showed that the dose-response
relationship between the crowding out effects and the intensity of tobacco expenditure
was present for food, medical care and housing. Overall, this study found that household
tobacco expenditure in Malaysia was low and its share in total household expenditure was
declining. Moreover, the impoverishment and welfare impact from direct tobacco
expenditure although present, was very modest. All of the major findings of this study
could be explained by the affordability of cigarettes which may be contributed by
suboptimal taxation of cigarettes, rampant availability of illicit cigarettes and pace of the
increase in income has exceeded the increase in the tobacco price. The main message here
is that the effectiveness of tobacco taxation is intrinsically linked to the availability of
illicit cigarettes and, as such, an increase in tobacco taxation must be concurrently
complemented by extensive control of illicit cigarettes to ensure that action to reduce
tobacco usage through the utilization of fiscal measures is effective. In light of the
v
foregoing, future research could concentrate on assessing the actual burden of illicit
cigarettes in Malaysia as well the tobacco tax mitigation strategies to fill the knowledge
gap identified in this study. |
---|