Comparative study on Divorce Laws under the law reform (Marriage and Divorce Act 1976) and Islamic family law: transition from divorce based on fault to non-fault ground / Naoko Kuwahara
This study attempts to specify changes of the Malaysian divorce law for the last twenty years in the modern context. In other words, it analyses lfOUn is for divor , undrr the LRA and the Islamic Family law Act 1984 from th' perspective of distinction of the dissolution of marriage between o...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9475/4/Comparative_Study_on_Divorce_Laws.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9475/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaya |
Summary: | This study attempts to specify changes of the Malaysian divorce law for the last twenty
years in the modern context. In other words, it analyses lfOUn is for divor , undrr the
LRA and the Islamic Family law Act 1984 from th' perspective of distinction of the
dissolution of marriage between on fault based ground and the non-foult based ground.
It concludes that, from th viewpoint transformation from fault based ground to
non-fault based ground of divorce law fault is still matter for the court to grant a decree
in the contested case under the LRA. It is, however, hardly presumed that the law is able
to rescue the marriage in which the parties have lived apart for such length that the law
requires and the attempt to reconcile by a conciliatory body failed. In such case, for the
purposes of achieving the object of the divorce law, that is to "enable the empty shell to
be destroyed with the maximum fairness and the minimum bitterness, di str s and
humiliation", the court should grant a decree where the breakdown of marriage i
proved, and should grant an ancillary relief in considering all circumstance including
the conduct of the parties and the interests of children. Under the I Jamie Family Law
Act 1984, apm'f from the divorce by mutual agr em nt of khul ', fault is principally
matter for women. For men, however, fa ult, and furthermore ground, are not necessarily
matter as far as law is concerned. |
---|