The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim

The debate on the value of providing corrective feedback on L2 writing has been prominent since Truscott’s (1996) claim on its inefficacy and harmful effects. With the aim of contributing to the discussion, this study reports on the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback (focused...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hanif Asyraf , Hashim
Format: Thesis
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/2/Hanif_Asyraf_Hashim.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/6/hanif.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
id my.um.stud.9673
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.stud.96732019-08-04T23:07:17Z The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim Hanif Asyraf , Hashim P Philology. Linguistics The debate on the value of providing corrective feedback on L2 writing has been prominent since Truscott’s (1996) claim on its inefficacy and harmful effects. With the aim of contributing to the discussion, this study reports on the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback (focused direct, focused indirect, unfocused direct, unfocused indirect) in improving the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners and whether such difference in efficacy is influenced by its efficacy in promoting the noticing function of the Output Hypothesis. 125 ESL learners were divided into four experimental groups and one control group and their progress in written grammatical accuracy was monitored through two treatment and three tests (pretest, posttest, delayed posttest). The results reveal that short-term improvement is demonstrated by the focused direct, unfocused direct, and focused indirect feedback while longitudinal improvement is only recorded by the focused direct feedback. Meanwhile, the unfocused indirect does not show much improvement as compared to the control group. The result also reveals the superior efficacy of direct feedback in playing its role as the facilitator for noticing as opposed to the indirect approach of CF provision. 2018-09 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/2/Hanif_Asyraf_Hashim.pdf application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/6/hanif.pdf Hanif Asyraf , Hashim (2018) The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim. Masters thesis, University of Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Student Repository
url_provider http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/
topic P Philology. Linguistics
spellingShingle P Philology. Linguistics
Hanif Asyraf , Hashim
The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim
description The debate on the value of providing corrective feedback on L2 writing has been prominent since Truscott’s (1996) claim on its inefficacy and harmful effects. With the aim of contributing to the discussion, this study reports on the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback (focused direct, focused indirect, unfocused direct, unfocused indirect) in improving the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners and whether such difference in efficacy is influenced by its efficacy in promoting the noticing function of the Output Hypothesis. 125 ESL learners were divided into four experimental groups and one control group and their progress in written grammatical accuracy was monitored through two treatment and three tests (pretest, posttest, delayed posttest). The results reveal that short-term improvement is demonstrated by the focused direct, unfocused direct, and focused indirect feedback while longitudinal improvement is only recorded by the focused direct feedback. Meanwhile, the unfocused indirect does not show much improvement as compared to the control group. The result also reveals the superior efficacy of direct feedback in playing its role as the facilitator for noticing as opposed to the indirect approach of CF provision.
format Thesis
author Hanif Asyraf , Hashim
author_facet Hanif Asyraf , Hashim
author_sort Hanif Asyraf , Hashim
title The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim
title_short The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim
title_full The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim
title_fullStr The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim
title_full_unstemmed The effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of ESL learners / Hanif Asyraf Hashim
title_sort effects of corrective feedback on the written grammatical accuracy of esl learners / hanif asyraf hashim
publishDate 2018
url http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/2/Hanif_Asyraf_Hashim.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/6/hanif.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9673/
_version_ 1738506289436164096