Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel

Solvent debinding is one of a crucial stage in Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) process. This process begins with the removal of the soluble binder components by using solvents such as heptane or hexane. In solvent debinding process, unsuccessful to achieve maximum binder removal will cause a defect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. F. F. A., Hamidi, W. S., Wan Harun, Nur Zalikha, Khalil, S. A., Che Ghani, M. Z., Azir
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19656/1/Study%20of%20solvent%20debinding%20parameters%20for%20metal%20injection%20moulded%20316L%20stainless%20steel.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19656/
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012035
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Pahang
Language: English
id my.ump.umpir.19656
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.196562018-08-29T02:39:57Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19656/ Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel M. F. F. A., Hamidi W. S., Wan Harun Nur Zalikha, Khalil S. A., Che Ghani M. Z., Azir Q Science (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Solvent debinding is one of a crucial stage in Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) process. This process begins with the removal of the soluble binder components by using solvents such as heptane or hexane. In solvent debinding process, unsuccessful to achieve maximum binder removal will cause a defect to the compact such as crack and swelling. So to have an optimum solvent debinding parameters are very important to improve the quality of the compact. Optimisation of solvent debinding process parameters for MIM of Stainless Steel 316L has been testified in this study. Gas atomised stainless steel 316L powder was mixed with a multicomponent binder in a twin blade mixer at a temperature of 150 °C for 90 minutes. The feedstock was successfully injected at the temperature of 150 °C. The green compacts were kept in n-heptane for eight different debinding times ranging between 30 to 240 minutes at temperatures of 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C to remove the primary binder components. From the result, the optimum temperature and time for solvent debinding were recorded at 60 °C and 240 minutes. Solvent debinding temperature and time give a significant effect on the rate of paraffin wax removal. IOP Publishing 2017 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19656/1/Study%20of%20solvent%20debinding%20parameters%20for%20metal%20injection%20moulded%20316L%20stainless%20steel.pdf M. F. F. A., Hamidi and W. S., Wan Harun and Nur Zalikha, Khalil and S. A., Che Ghani and M. Z., Azir (2017) Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 4th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research (ICMER2017), 1-2 August 2017 , Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. pp. 1-9., 257 (012035). ISSN 1757-899X https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012035
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic Q Science (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
M. F. F. A., Hamidi
W. S., Wan Harun
Nur Zalikha, Khalil
S. A., Che Ghani
M. Z., Azir
Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel
description Solvent debinding is one of a crucial stage in Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) process. This process begins with the removal of the soluble binder components by using solvents such as heptane or hexane. In solvent debinding process, unsuccessful to achieve maximum binder removal will cause a defect to the compact such as crack and swelling. So to have an optimum solvent debinding parameters are very important to improve the quality of the compact. Optimisation of solvent debinding process parameters for MIM of Stainless Steel 316L has been testified in this study. Gas atomised stainless steel 316L powder was mixed with a multicomponent binder in a twin blade mixer at a temperature of 150 °C for 90 minutes. The feedstock was successfully injected at the temperature of 150 °C. The green compacts were kept in n-heptane for eight different debinding times ranging between 30 to 240 minutes at temperatures of 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C to remove the primary binder components. From the result, the optimum temperature and time for solvent debinding were recorded at 60 °C and 240 minutes. Solvent debinding temperature and time give a significant effect on the rate of paraffin wax removal.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author M. F. F. A., Hamidi
W. S., Wan Harun
Nur Zalikha, Khalil
S. A., Che Ghani
M. Z., Azir
author_facet M. F. F. A., Hamidi
W. S., Wan Harun
Nur Zalikha, Khalil
S. A., Che Ghani
M. Z., Azir
author_sort M. F. F. A., Hamidi
title Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel
title_short Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel
title_full Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel
title_fullStr Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel
title_full_unstemmed Study of Solvent Debinding Parameters for Metal Injection Moulded 316L Stainless Steel
title_sort study of solvent debinding parameters for metal injection moulded 316l stainless steel
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2017
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19656/1/Study%20of%20solvent%20debinding%20parameters%20for%20metal%20injection%20moulded%20316L%20stainless%20steel.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19656/
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012035
_version_ 1643668702172807168