Hydrological Modelling using HEC-HMS for Flood Risk Assessment of Segamat Town, Malaysia

This paper presents an assessment of the applicability of using Hydrologic Modelling System developed by the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC-HMS) for hydrological modelling of Segamat River. The objective of the model application is to assist in the assessment of flood risk by providing the peak...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Noor Suraya, Romali, Zulkifli, Yusop, Ahmad Zuhdi, Ismail
التنسيق: Conference or Workshop Item
اللغة:English
English
منشور في: IOP Publishing Ltd 2018
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20679/7/Hydrological%20Modelling%20using%20HEC-HMS%20for%20Flood%20Risk%20Assessment%20of%20Segamat%20town%2C%20Malaysia.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20679/13/Hydrological%20Modelling%20using%20HEC-HMS%20for%20Flood%20Risk%20Assessment%20of%20Segamat%20town%2C%20Malaysia%201.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/20679/
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/318/1/012029
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
المؤسسة: Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
اللغة: English
English
الوصف
الملخص:This paper presents an assessment of the applicability of using Hydrologic Modelling System developed by the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC-HMS) for hydrological modelling of Segamat River. The objective of the model application is to assist in the assessment of flood risk by providing the peak flows of 2011 Segamat flood for the generation of flood mapping of Segamat town. The capability of the model was evaluated by comparing the historical observed data with the simulation results of the selected flood events. The model calibration and validation efficiency was verified using Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient. The results demonstrate the interest to implement the hydrological model for assessing flood risk where the simulated peak flow result is in agreement with historical observed data. The model efficiency of the calibrated and validated exercises is 0.90 and 0.76 respectively, which is acceptable.