Substandard journal management: wastage of authors’ motivation
Authors who offer papers for publication to professional journals are under the impression that their work is publication-worthy. The editors as well as reviewers adjudge whether the manuscripts should be taken up for publication. This paper presents certain cases of unreliable journals’ management...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29372/1/Substandard%20journal%20management-%20Wastage%20of%20authors%27%20motivation.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29372/ https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6010011 https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6010011 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | Authors who offer papers for publication to professional journals are under the impression that their work is publication-worthy. The editors as well as reviewers adjudge whether the manuscripts should be taken up for publication. This paper presents certain cases of unreliable journals’ management processes with an aim to show how a journal reviewer or editor could squander authors’ time and negatively impact the motivation of scholars to publish. |
|---|