Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method

Car assembly is a combination of all components that form one completed vehicle unit. The work process is manually done and repeatedly, which contributes to a risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Chassis assembly is a job with a high level of complexity and associated with MSD risk for its emplo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nelfiyanti, ., N. M. Zuki, N. M., M. F. F., Ab Rashid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/1/Analysis%20of%20measurement%20and%20calculation%20of%20MSD%20complaint.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Pahang
Language: English
id my.ump.umpir.34606
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.346062022-07-07T06:18:36Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/ Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method Nelfiyanti, . N. M. Zuki, N. M. M. F. F., Ab Rashid TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Car assembly is a combination of all components that form one completed vehicle unit. The work process is manually done and repeatedly, which contributes to a risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Chassis assembly is a job with a high level of complexity and associated with MSD risk for its employees. This study consists of 30 assembly activities divided into six groups based on posture and working methods used during the work process. Group A consists of 7 assemblies, Group B consists of 8 assemblies, Group C consists of 5 assemblies, Group D consists of 2 assemblies, Group E consists of 5 assemblies, and Group F consists of 3 assemblies. This study aims to compare the measurement and calculation of the risk level of MSD workers by using the RULA, REBA, and OWAS methods. The results of the measurements and computations acquired using these three approaches yielded the same risk category: 83.33 % medium risk/dangerous in working groups A, C, D, E, and F, and 16.67 % very high risk/highly hazardous in working group B. These six groups, particularly group B, requires immediate attention to reduce worker complaints of MSD. Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2022-06 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/1/Analysis%20of%20measurement%20and%20calculation%20of%20MSD%20complaint.pdf Nelfiyanti, . and N. M. Zuki, N. M. and M. F. F., Ab Rashid (2022) Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering (IJAME), 19 (2). 9681 -9692. ISSN 2180-1606 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Nelfiyanti, .
N. M. Zuki, N. M.
M. F. F., Ab Rashid
Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
description Car assembly is a combination of all components that form one completed vehicle unit. The work process is manually done and repeatedly, which contributes to a risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Chassis assembly is a job with a high level of complexity and associated with MSD risk for its employees. This study consists of 30 assembly activities divided into six groups based on posture and working methods used during the work process. Group A consists of 7 assemblies, Group B consists of 8 assemblies, Group C consists of 5 assemblies, Group D consists of 2 assemblies, Group E consists of 5 assemblies, and Group F consists of 3 assemblies. This study aims to compare the measurement and calculation of the risk level of MSD workers by using the RULA, REBA, and OWAS methods. The results of the measurements and computations acquired using these three approaches yielded the same risk category: 83.33 % medium risk/dangerous in working groups A, C, D, E, and F, and 16.67 % very high risk/highly hazardous in working group B. These six groups, particularly group B, requires immediate attention to reduce worker complaints of MSD.
format Article
author Nelfiyanti, .
N. M. Zuki, N. M.
M. F. F., Ab Rashid
author_facet Nelfiyanti, .
N. M. Zuki, N. M.
M. F. F., Ab Rashid
author_sort Nelfiyanti, .
title Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
title_short Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
title_full Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
title_fullStr Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
title_sort analysis of measurement and calculation of msd complaint of chassis assembly workers using owas, rula and reba method
publisher Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang
publishDate 2022
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/1/Analysis%20of%20measurement%20and%20calculation%20of%20MSD%20complaint.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747
_version_ 1738510520970903552