Detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in fundus images using convolution neural network

Convolution Neural Network (CNN) is one of the techniques under Artificial Neural Network (ANN) used to develop a Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) algorithm for detection of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) on the fundus images. About 116 PDR and 150 Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Hasliza, Abu Hassan, Marzuqi, Yaakob, Sasni, Ismail, Juwairiyyah, Abd Rahman, Izyani, Mat Rusni, Azlee, Zabidi, Ihsan, Mohd Yassin, Nooritawati, Md Tahir, Suraiya, Mohamad Shafie
格式: Conference or Workshop Item
語言:English
出版: Institute of Physics Publishing 2020
主題:
在線閱讀:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/37364/1/Detection%20of%20proliferative%20diabetic%20retinopathy%20in%20fundus%20images%20using%20convolution%20neural%20network.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/37364/
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/769/1/012029
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:Convolution Neural Network (CNN) is one of the techniques under Artificial Neural Network (ANN) used to develop a Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) algorithm for detection of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) on the fundus images. About 116 PDR and 150 Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) of fundus images retrieved from the publicly available MESSIDOR database applied in this research. This study consisted three objectives that included the execution of two pre-processing techniques on the data-set which were resizing and normalizing the fundus images, developed deep learning operational Artificial Intelligence (AI) network of feature extraction algorithm for detection of PDR on the fundus images and determined the output classification of the network encompassing the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. There were five different parameters carried out along this research. Here, Parameter 5 showed the best performance among the five parameters based on the value of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity that was 73.81%, 76%, and 69% respectively.