Character assessment for heritage landscape resource at world heritage site
Heritage landscape a great variety of unique landscapes can be identified with distinctive regions of earth with historical value, unchanged, rare and pre-existing species of the present and the future. Heritage landscape perspectives are important to recognize, preserve, enhance and enrich the land...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/26734/1/Character%20Assessment%20for%20Heritage%20Landscape%20Resource%20at%20World%20Heritage%20Site.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/26734/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sabah |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Heritage landscape a great variety of unique landscapes can be identified with distinctive regions of earth with historical value, unchanged, rare and pre-existing species of the present and the future. Heritage landscape perspectives are important to recognize, preserve, enhance and enrich the landscape values associated with heritage history. The aim of this paper is to contribute a comprehensive, holistic character assessment for the perspective of heritage landscape resources. Some parameters to consider in determining a landscape heritage resources. The parameters are divided into five sections and sub-topics are linear considered. The approach is a continuation of the findings of three main categories of criteria assessment, i.e. primary, secondary and minor. The research involved four categories of stakeholders as respondents, which is Government, Non-Governmental Organizations or NGOs, such as Mountain Guides, Visitors and Local. Methodology approach is a mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) of findings validated through triangulation data. Privileges of heritage landscape evaluation criteria can be used as a guide for evaluating heritage landscape resources and assisting local authorities as an alternative to developing policies and guidelines for public heritage sites. |
---|