Prospective diagnostic study on the use of narrow‐band imaging on suspicious lesions during colonoscopy examination

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the gold standard to detect colorectal neoplasm. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) has a good diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. This study explores the diagnostic validity of NBI colonoscopy as well as its associated f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huzairi Yaacob, Sani Mohamad Ikhwan, Mohd Nizam Hashim, Syed Hassan Syed Abd Aziz, Wan Zainira Wan Zain, Sharifah Emilia Tuan Sharif, Mohd Firdaus Mohd Hayati, Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Wiley Blackwell 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/28961/3/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/28961/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/28961/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ases.12463
https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12463
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Language: English
English
Description
Summary:Introduction: Colonoscopy is the gold standard to detect colorectal neoplasm. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) has a good diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. This study explores the diagnostic validity of NBI colonoscopy as well as its associated factors related to neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. Methods: This study enrolled 100 patients in a single-center tertiary teaching hospital. Patients presented for screening colonoscopy, and those with suspicious colorectal lesions were included in this study. During colonoscopy, the most suspicious lesion in each patient was analyzed using the NBI system based on Sano’s classification. Each lesion was biopsied for histopathological analysis, the gold standard. Endoscopic images were captured electronically. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of NBI colonoscopy were assessed. Other associated factors related to neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions were analyzed accordingly. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the NBI were 88.2% and 71.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver–operator curve was 0.801, indicating that NBI has a good ability to differentiate between disease and non-disease. There are significant associations between histopathological examination outcomes and both presenting symptoms, especially weight loss, and lesion site, even after other variables were controlled (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The NBI system in colonoscopy was capable of distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. It indicates an acceptable level of agreement with histopathology, the gold standard. However, the role of NBI in screening and surveillance in Malaysia still needs further evaluation and exploration.