Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings

Access is limited to UniMAP community.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nazrul Amir, Rejab
Other Authors: Mohd Zulham Affandi Mohd Zahid
Format: Learning Object
Language:English
Published: Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/39286
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Language: English
id my.unimap-39286
record_format dspace
spelling my.unimap-392862015-03-24T03:31:23Z Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings Nazrul Amir, Rejab Mohd Zulham Affandi Mohd Zahid Reinforcement Concrete (RC) RC building Fundamental period Building structure Access is limited to UniMAP community. EC 2 standard and EC 8 standard as a parameter in determined the characteristic of fundamental period. From the research, the analyses were conducted based on the physical properties, and strength properties. The research is done in order to compare the properties of the building structure design under EC 2 standard and under EC 8 standard in determined the characteristic of fundamental period. Three types of frame were chosen. The frames were label as Regular Frame, Irregular Frame with Transfer Beam, and Irregular Frame with Setback. To achieve the research, all the analysis will be conducted either design by manual calculation or computer added design (CAD). SAP 2000 were used for the whole process of analysis during the research been conducted. As a result, either less physical properties in term of size, area, and amount of the reinforcement bars or less strength properties such as of yield, displacement, tensile resistance, inelastic behavior and stiffness based on structure design under EC 2 standard, produced the higher value of fundamental period from structure design under EC 8 standard. In terms of load distribution, the bigger value for bending moments of structure resulting the higher value of fundamental period. As an additional conclusion, the lesser value of the fundamental period value, the more safe for the occupants. Besides that, the cost of constructing the building was high based on the physical properties. Refer to this statement, structure design under EC 8 standards were not practical to construct in Malaysia. 2015-03-24T03:31:23Z 2015-03-24T03:31:23Z 2013-06 Learning Object http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/39286 en Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) School of Environmental Engineering
institution Universiti Malaysia Perlis
building UniMAP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Perlis
content_source UniMAP Library Digital Repository
url_provider http://dspace.unimap.edu.my/
language English
topic Reinforcement Concrete (RC)
RC building
Fundamental period
Building structure
spellingShingle Reinforcement Concrete (RC)
RC building
Fundamental period
Building structure
Nazrul Amir, Rejab
Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings
description Access is limited to UniMAP community.
author2 Mohd Zulham Affandi Mohd Zahid
author_facet Mohd Zulham Affandi Mohd Zahid
Nazrul Amir, Rejab
format Learning Object
author Nazrul Amir, Rejab
author_sort Nazrul Amir, Rejab
title Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings
title_short Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings
title_full Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings
title_fullStr Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings
title_full_unstemmed Fundamental periods for medium-rise Reinforcement Concrete (RC) buildings
title_sort fundamental periods for medium-rise reinforcement concrete (rc) buildings
publisher Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)
publishDate 2015
url http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/39286
_version_ 1643799021113835520