Navigating Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions in emergency department in Malaysia: A retrospective study
Introduction: The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by exploring DNAR deci...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malaysian Medical Association
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46299/1/Navigating%20Do-Not-Attempt.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46299/ https://www.e-mjm.org/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Introduction: The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation
(DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge
medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is
limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries,
including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by
exploring DNAR decision-making processes in a Malaysian
tertiary hospital.
Materials and Methods: A mixed-method retrospective study
was conducted in the emergency and trauma department
(ETD) of Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia, from February
to July 2023. Data were collected from 115 DNAR cases
using a surveillance form to document the patient
demographics, types of DNAR orders, initiating physicians,
reasons for DNAR, surrogate decision-makers, specific
types of procedures withheld or withdrawn and outcomes.
Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data, while
inferential statistical analysis was applied to quantitative
data.
Results: The mean age of patients was 71.32 years, with a
male predominance (63.5%). The primary reasons for DNAR
included “critical illness with poor prognosis” (33.9%),
“advanced age with frailty and poor prognosis” (20.9%) and
“massive haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke” (16.5%). Most
DNAR decisions involved withholding resuscitation (90.4%)
and were initiated mainly by internal medicine (52.2%) and
emergency medicine teams (34.8%). Surrogate decisionmakers were predominantly adult children (63.5%). Only one
case had an advance directive. Majority of patients (80.9%)
were admitted to wards, while 16.5% died in the emergency
department. The median age of patients was significantly
older when adult children (78 years) and spouses (76 years)
were the surrogates, compared to when they were not
involved (64.5 years and 62.5 years, respectively; p < 0.001
and p = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, the median age was
significantly younger when parents (41.5 years) and siblings
(64 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were
not involved (75 years and 74 years, respectively; p < 0.001
for both).
Conclusion: Advanced directives are rarely applied in
Malaysia. DNAR decisions are typically made by surrogates
when patients are critically ill, which is a common trend in
many Asian cultures where discussing death is taboo.
Cultural norms often lead families to withhold terminal diagnoses from patients, posing challenges for end-of-life
care. The most frequent surrogates were adult children, who
face dilemmas balancing aggressive treatment and their
parents’ wishes. The study underscores the need for better
communication and decision-making support in emergency
departments. |
---|