Experimental analysis of the effect of water pressure on the atomization performance of a Linear Laval nozzle and comparison with numerical analysis
Inhaling dust can lead to respiratory diseases, and dust accumulation in the workplace can pose fire and explosion hazards. Traditional dust removal nozzles require high water pressure and produce large droplet diameters. The Laval nozzle, utilizing a converging-diverging section to accelerate flu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46305/1/Experimental%20analysis%20of%20the%20effect.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46305/ https://www.scielo.br/j/rmat/a/54CWgyCTycyQyh6LHp5xLzg/ https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2024-0460 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Inhaling dust can lead to respiratory diseases, and dust accumulation in the workplace can pose fire and
explosion hazards. Traditional dust removal nozzles require high water pressure and produce large droplet
diameters. The Laval nozzle, utilizing a converging-diverging section to accelerate fluid to supersonic speeds,
achieves finer droplets and a more concentrated particle size distribution. However, curved Laval nozzle is
different to manufacture. To study the effect of water pressure on the atomization performance of a Linear
Laval nozzle, a laser particle analyzer and a camera were used to test the droplet size and atomization angle.
These results were compared with numerical analysis. The findings indicate that as the water pressure increases
from 0.1 MPa to 0.5 MPa, the dropletsʼ Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) increases almost linearly. At the same
time, the spray angle tends to decrease. Both experimental and numerical analyses show the same trend. At
a water pressure of 0.1 MPa, the atomization performance of the Linear Laval nozzle is optimal. Compared
to traditional nozzles, the water pressure is significantly reduced, and the D(3,2) droplet diameter is notably
smaller. Moreover, the atomization angle is considerably increased. The spray effect has been significantly
improved |
---|