Distribution and prevalence of chloramphenicol-resistance gene in Escherichia coli isolated from aquaculture and other environment

In Malaysia, the aquaculture industry, particularly the production of freshwater aquaculture fish, is growing rapidly. Nevertheless, the illegal use of banned antimicrobial agents such as chloramphenicol in aquaculture has become a major concern in relation to the safety of consumers and also the de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel, Lihan, Kathleen Michelle, Mikal, Ng, Kok Hua, Leong, Sui Sien, Felecia, Christilda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Food Science & Technology, UPM. 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31024/1/Mikal.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31024/
http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
Language: English
Description
Summary:In Malaysia, the aquaculture industry, particularly the production of freshwater aquaculture fish, is growing rapidly. Nevertheless, the illegal use of banned antimicrobial agents such as chloramphenicol in aquaculture has become a major concern in relation to the safety of consumers and also the development of drug-resistant strains in bacteria. Driven by those factors, the main intention of this study was to determine the prevalence and types of chloramphenicolresistance genes in E. coli isolated from aquaculture and other environmental waters. The respective chloramphenicol-resistance genes in the isolates were detected by multiplex PCR with four sense primers C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4 and one antisense primer C-R for targeting cat I, cat II, cat III and cat IV genes, respectively. Out of 27 E. coli isolated, 19 were resistant to chloramphenicol. Cat I, cat II, cat III and cat IV genes were detected in 19, 13, 10, and 6 of the E. coli isolates, respectively. The results of this study revealed that chloramphenicol-resistance E. coli is present in aquaculture and environmental waters, in the study area. This finding suggested that although banned, there could be illegal usage of chloramphenicol antibiotic in local aquaculture. The bacteria in aquaculture may have spread to other environmental water through disposal of aquaculture waste water to other environments.