Physical and Mechanical Properties Performance between Untreated and Treated with CCA Treatment at Different Age Groups of Fast-Growing Acacia Hybrid of Sarawak
An effort was carried out to fully utilise fast-growing Acacia hybrid usage in the timber engineering field; however, the research data are still lacking. This paper aims to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties performance between untreated (control) and treated with 10% copper chrome...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/40609/3/Physical.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/40609/ https://www.mdpi.com/journal/forests |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
Language: | English |
Summary: | An effort was carried out to fully utilise fast-growing Acacia hybrid usage in the timber
engineering field; however, the research data are still lacking. This paper aims to evaluate the physical
and mechanical properties performance between untreated (control) and treated with 10% copper
chrome arsenic of Acacia hybrid collected from Daikin Plantation Sdn. Bhd. Bintulu, Sarawak at
air-dry condition at different age groups using the small clear method. Mechanical properties test
refers to shear parallel to grain (tangential and radial directions), cleavage (tangential and radial
directions), and tension parallel to grain test. Meanwhile, the physical properties test refers to
moisture content (MC) and density test. After treatment, mechanical properties increase with an
average of 13.67%; meanwhile, moisture content decreased with an average of 0.58% or 0.09% MC,
and density slightly increased with an average of 0.44% or 0.002 g/cm3
. Results indicate that 10-yearold Acacia hybrid exhibits the highest strength values in shear parallel to the grain, tension parallel
to the grain, and cleavage, followed by 13-year-old and 7-year-old. Treated samples in the tangential
direction performed better with consistent mean results than that of the untreated samples, while
radial direction gave a high average strength increment when treated. |
---|