Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
One indicator of wireless network performance is throughput quality where the measurement of throughput quality itself has the aim of knowing the quality of service of a network and a picture of the behavior of the network. In measuring the quality of service of a network, supporting software is nee...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Informatics Laboratory Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Indonesia
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/3/Studi%20Komparasi.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/ https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/komtika/article/view/11218 https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v8i1.11218 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
Language: | English |
id |
my.unimas.ir.45009 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.unimas.ir.450092024-06-21T06:49:49Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/ Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering One indicator of wireless network performance is throughput quality where the measurement of throughput quality itself has the aim of knowing the quality of service of a network and a picture of the behavior of the network. In measuring the quality of service of a network, supporting software is needed that can be used to measure the value of the quality of throughput. One of the software that can be used is graphical user interface-based software, namely JPERF, and command-line-based software, namely JPERF version 3. This study aims to compare and analyze two Command Line (CLI) based software using iperf version 3 and Graphical User Interface (GUI) based software using jperf which can produce the highest quality of TCP and UDP network throughput. The test results show that the use of JPERF software produces a higher throughput value when measuring throughput quality using the TCP protocol where the largest difference produced is 5 Mbps when sending 384 KB data packets while the throughput quality measurement using the UDP protocol iperf software version 3 produces a higher throughput value where there is the largest difference generated by 22 Mbps when sending 128 KB packets. Informatics Laboratory Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Indonesia 2024-05-31 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/3/Studi%20Komparasi.pdf Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro and Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief (2024) Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac. Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi dan Informatika), 8 (1). pp. 14-21. ISSN 2580-2852 https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/komtika/article/view/11218 https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v8i1.11218 |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
building |
Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS) |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
content_source |
UNIMAS Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ir.unimas.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering |
spellingShingle |
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac |
description |
One indicator of wireless network performance is throughput quality where the measurement of throughput quality itself has the aim of knowing the quality of service of a network and a picture of the behavior of the network. In measuring the quality of service of a network, supporting software is needed that can be used to measure the value of the quality of throughput. One of the software that can be used is graphical user interface-based software, namely JPERF, and command-line-based software, namely JPERF version 3. This study aims to compare and analyze two Command Line (CLI) based software using iperf version 3 and Graphical User Interface (GUI) based software using jperf which can produce the highest quality of TCP and UDP network throughput. The test results show that the use of JPERF software produces a higher throughput value when measuring throughput quality using the TCP protocol where the largest difference produced is 5 Mbps when sending 384 KB data packets while the throughput quality measurement using the UDP protocol iperf software version 3 produces a higher throughput value where there is the largest difference generated by 22 Mbps when sending 128 KB packets. |
format |
Article |
author |
Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief |
author_facet |
Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief |
author_sort |
Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro |
title |
Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac |
title_short |
Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac |
title_full |
Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac |
title_fullStr |
Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac |
title_full_unstemmed |
Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac |
title_sort |
studi komparasi software berbasis gui dan cli terhadap pengukuran kualitas throughput jaringan nirkabel ieee 802.11ac |
publisher |
Informatics Laboratory Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Indonesia |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/3/Studi%20Komparasi.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/ https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/komtika/article/view/11218 https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v8i1.11218 |
_version_ |
1802981837106053120 |