Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac

One indicator of wireless network performance is throughput quality where the measurement of throughput quality itself has the aim of knowing the quality of service of a network and a picture of the behavior of the network. In measuring the quality of service of a network, supporting software is nee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro, Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Informatics Laboratory Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Indonesia 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/3/Studi%20Komparasi.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/
https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/komtika/article/view/11218
https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v8i1.11218
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
Language: English
id my.unimas.ir.45009
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.450092024-06-21T06:49:49Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/ Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering One indicator of wireless network performance is throughput quality where the measurement of throughput quality itself has the aim of knowing the quality of service of a network and a picture of the behavior of the network. In measuring the quality of service of a network, supporting software is needed that can be used to measure the value of the quality of throughput. One of the software that can be used is graphical user interface-based software, namely JPERF, and command-line-based software, namely JPERF version 3. This study aims to compare and analyze two Command Line (CLI) based software using iperf version 3 and Graphical User Interface (GUI) based software using jperf which can produce the highest quality of TCP and UDP network throughput. The test results show that the use of JPERF software produces a higher throughput value when measuring throughput quality using the TCP protocol where the largest difference produced is 5 Mbps when sending 384 KB data packets while the throughput quality measurement using the UDP protocol iperf software version 3 produces a higher throughput value where there is the largest difference generated by 22 Mbps when sending 128 KB packets. Informatics Laboratory Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Indonesia 2024-05-31 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/3/Studi%20Komparasi.pdf Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro and Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief (2024) Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac. Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi dan Informatika), 8 (1). pp. 14-21. ISSN 2580-2852 https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/komtika/article/view/11218 https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v8i1.11218
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro
Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief
Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
description One indicator of wireless network performance is throughput quality where the measurement of throughput quality itself has the aim of knowing the quality of service of a network and a picture of the behavior of the network. In measuring the quality of service of a network, supporting software is needed that can be used to measure the value of the quality of throughput. One of the software that can be used is graphical user interface-based software, namely JPERF, and command-line-based software, namely JPERF version 3. This study aims to compare and analyze two Command Line (CLI) based software using iperf version 3 and Graphical User Interface (GUI) based software using jperf which can produce the highest quality of TCP and UDP network throughput. The test results show that the use of JPERF software produces a higher throughput value when measuring throughput quality using the TCP protocol where the largest difference produced is 5 Mbps when sending 384 KB data packets while the throughput quality measurement using the UDP protocol iperf software version 3 produces a higher throughput value where there is the largest difference generated by 22 Mbps when sending 128 KB packets.
format Article
author Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro
Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief
author_facet Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro
Yanuar Zulardiansyah, Arief
author_sort Vian Ardiyansyah, Saputro
title Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
title_short Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
title_full Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
title_fullStr Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
title_full_unstemmed Studi Komparasi Software berbasis GUI dan CLI Terhadap Pengukuran Kualitas Throughput Jaringan Nirkabel IEEE 802.11ac
title_sort studi komparasi software berbasis gui dan cli terhadap pengukuran kualitas throughput jaringan nirkabel ieee 802.11ac
publisher Informatics Laboratory Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Indonesia
publishDate 2024
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/3/Studi%20Komparasi.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45009/
https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/komtika/article/view/11218
https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v8i1.11218
_version_ 1802981837106053120