Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
The blind beamforming technique is employed in the broadband wireless mobile systems to enhance the cellular systems in the aspect of capacity, data rates, null steering and coverage. This paper presents two methods of beamforming algorithm; Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and Linear...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
id |
my.uniten.dspace-30435 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-304352023-12-29T15:47:47Z Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C. 57769851500 15128307800 22951210700 16021614500 Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR The blind beamforming technique is employed in the broadband wireless mobile systems to enhance the cellular systems in the aspect of capacity, data rates, null steering and coverage. This paper presents two methods of beamforming algorithm; Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and Linear Constraint Minimum Variance (LCMV). MVDR and LCMV techniques form radiation beams based on the received weight vector of the desired signal. Simulation has been carried out to validate these two techniques. Four elements of the linear array antenna are used in our simulation program with the carrier frequency around 2.3 GHz, noise power 0.5dB, and the spacing between elements is 0.5 ?. The result of the simulation reveals that both the modes are capable of providing high output power; however direction of all the incoming sources is required, which is practically difficult to obtain. Nevertheless the MVDR beamforming, minimizes the multi-path fading problem, by adding the multi-path signal, which increases the strength of the desired signal and nullifies the interference. Overall, the MVDR technique is more accurate than the LCMV to null to find the interference source and directing radiation lobe with high power towards the desired signal. � 2012 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l.-All rights reserved. Final 2023-12-29T07:47:47Z 2023-12-29T07:47:47Z 2012 Article 2-s2.0-84906542690 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906542690&partnerID=40&md5=6b4cecfb3f1b1357c927c8c99984d71e https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30435 2 2 153 159 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR |
spellingShingle |
Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C. Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system |
description |
The blind beamforming technique is employed in the broadband wireless mobile systems to enhance the cellular systems in the aspect of capacity, data rates, null steering and coverage. This paper presents two methods of beamforming algorithm; Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and Linear Constraint Minimum Variance (LCMV). MVDR and LCMV techniques form radiation beams based on the received weight vector of the desired signal. Simulation has been carried out to validate these two techniques. Four elements of the linear array antenna are used in our simulation program with the carrier frequency around 2.3 GHz, noise power 0.5dB, and the spacing between elements is 0.5 ?. The result of the simulation reveals that both the modes are capable of providing high output power; however direction of all the incoming sources is required, which is practically difficult to obtain. Nevertheless the MVDR beamforming, minimizes the multi-path fading problem, by adding the multi-path signal, which increases the strength of the desired signal and nullifies the interference. Overall, the MVDR technique is more accurate than the LCMV to null to find the interference source and directing radiation lobe with high power towards the desired signal. � 2012 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l.-All rights reserved. |
author2 |
57769851500 |
author_facet |
57769851500 Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C. |
format |
Article |
author |
Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C. |
author_sort |
Salem B. |
title |
Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system |
title_short |
Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system |
title_full |
Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system |
title_fullStr |
Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system |
title_sort |
performance comparison of mvdr and lcmv beamforming algorithm in 2.3 ghz adaptive antenna system |
publisher |
Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806423384860393472 |