Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume

Rubberised cementitious material has gained significant attention within the civil engineering community. However, the gap and voids between rubber particles and cement gel remain challenge. To tackle these issues, silica fume (SF) and graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) were used to enhance the microstru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Algaifi H.A., Syamsir A., Baharom S., Alyami M., Al-Fakih A.M., Anggraini V.
Other Authors: 57203885467
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Tenaga Nasional
id my.uniten.dspace-33910
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-339102024-10-14T11:17:25Z Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume Algaifi H.A. Syamsir A. Baharom S. Alyami M. Al-Fakih A.M. Anggraini V. 57203885467 57195320482 8671436000 58093864800 56037643900 35072537800 Graphene-based cementitious material Green cementitious material mechanical properties Propagation of concrete cracks Rubberised cementitious material Cements Concretes Cracks Microstructure Mortar Nanotechnology Rubber Silica fume Water absorption Cementitious materials Concrete cracks Graphene nanoplatelets Graphene-based cementitious material Green cementitious material Propagation of concrete crack Rubberized cementitious material Ultrasonic pulse velocity Graphene Rubberised cementitious material has gained significant attention within the civil engineering community. However, the gap and voids between rubber particles and cement gel remain challenge. To tackle these issues, silica fume (SF) and graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) were used to enhance the microstructure of rubberised mortar at micro and nano scale levels. Silica fume was added at 20% of the cement weight, while, the inoculation of GnPs varied from 0.02% to 0.6% as cement replacement and the rubber powder ranged between 2% and 8% as sand replacement (by volume). The compressive (CS), flexural (FS), tensile (TS), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption (WA) and porosity (P) of the proposed mortar were evaluated at the age of 28 days. The experimental and predicted outcome showed that the rubberised mortar incorporating SF and GnPs imparted superior properties compared to that of the control mixture for all rubber replacement percentage. For instance, when the rubber content was 5% and GnPs was 0.03%, the CS, FS, TS, UPV, WA and P were 45.51 MPA, 5.41 MPa, 3.13 MPa, 3.89 km/s, 5.23% and 7.22% compared to that of the control mortar without rubber (38.3 MPa, 4.1 MPa, 2.31 MPa, 3.65 km/s, 6.51% and 7.28%), respectively. FESEM also confirmed that the GnPs did not only acted as a filler material but also served as an impermeable barrier for continued crack propagation. It can be concluded that the inclusion of GnPs in rubberised cement-based material is considered as a sustainable choice in which it enhances its microstructure, specifically the interfacial transition zone (ITZ). � 2023 The Authors Final 2024-10-14T03:17:25Z 2024-10-14T03:17:25Z 2023 Article 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02567 2-s2.0-85173832551 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173832551&doi=10.1016%2fj.cscm.2023.e02567&partnerID=40&md5=ed10697dab612a79451a0eac58758079 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/33910 19 e02567 All Open Access Gold Open Access Elsevier Ltd Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic Graphene-based cementitious material
Green cementitious material
mechanical properties
Propagation of concrete cracks
Rubberised cementitious material
Cements
Concretes
Cracks
Microstructure
Mortar
Nanotechnology
Rubber
Silica fume
Water absorption
Cementitious materials
Concrete cracks
Graphene nanoplatelets
Graphene-based cementitious material
Green cementitious material
Propagation of concrete crack
Rubberized cementitious material
Ultrasonic pulse velocity
Graphene
spellingShingle Graphene-based cementitious material
Green cementitious material
mechanical properties
Propagation of concrete cracks
Rubberised cementitious material
Cements
Concretes
Cracks
Microstructure
Mortar
Nanotechnology
Rubber
Silica fume
Water absorption
Cementitious materials
Concrete cracks
Graphene nanoplatelets
Graphene-based cementitious material
Green cementitious material
Propagation of concrete crack
Rubberized cementitious material
Ultrasonic pulse velocity
Graphene
Algaifi H.A.
Syamsir A.
Baharom S.
Alyami M.
Al-Fakih A.M.
Anggraini V.
Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
description Rubberised cementitious material has gained significant attention within the civil engineering community. However, the gap and voids between rubber particles and cement gel remain challenge. To tackle these issues, silica fume (SF) and graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) were used to enhance the microstructure of rubberised mortar at micro and nano scale levels. Silica fume was added at 20% of the cement weight, while, the inoculation of GnPs varied from 0.02% to 0.6% as cement replacement and the rubber powder ranged between 2% and 8% as sand replacement (by volume). The compressive (CS), flexural (FS), tensile (TS), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption (WA) and porosity (P) of the proposed mortar were evaluated at the age of 28 days. The experimental and predicted outcome showed that the rubberised mortar incorporating SF and GnPs imparted superior properties compared to that of the control mixture for all rubber replacement percentage. For instance, when the rubber content was 5% and GnPs was 0.03%, the CS, FS, TS, UPV, WA and P were 45.51 MPA, 5.41 MPa, 3.13 MPa, 3.89 km/s, 5.23% and 7.22% compared to that of the control mortar without rubber (38.3 MPa, 4.1 MPa, 2.31 MPa, 3.65 km/s, 6.51% and 7.28%), respectively. FESEM also confirmed that the GnPs did not only acted as a filler material but also served as an impermeable barrier for continued crack propagation. It can be concluded that the inclusion of GnPs in rubberised cement-based material is considered as a sustainable choice in which it enhances its microstructure, specifically the interfacial transition zone (ITZ). � 2023 The Authors
author2 57203885467
author_facet 57203885467
Algaifi H.A.
Syamsir A.
Baharom S.
Alyami M.
Al-Fakih A.M.
Anggraini V.
format Article
author Algaifi H.A.
Syamsir A.
Baharom S.
Alyami M.
Al-Fakih A.M.
Anggraini V.
author_sort Algaifi H.A.
title Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
title_short Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
title_full Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
title_fullStr Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
title_full_unstemmed Development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
title_sort development of rubberised cementitious material incorporating graphene nanoplatelets and silica fume
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2024
_version_ 1814061031005093888