Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces

A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students� preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach withi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sidhu M.S., Ying J.G.
Other Authors: 56259597000
Format: Article
Published: SAGE Publications Inc. 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Tenaga Nasional
id my.uniten.dspace-34510
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-345102024-10-14T11:20:17Z Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces Sidhu M.S. Ying J.G. 56259597000 57195804746 Augmented reality engineering education multiple functions user interface tangible user interface Augmented reality Computer software selection and evaluation Engineering education Students Augmented reality technology Comparative analyzes Cross-sectional design Engineering problems Interface applications Multiple function Multiple function user interface Tangible user interfaces Users' experiences Wilcoxon signed rank test User interfaces A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students� preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI. � The Author(s) 2023. Article in press 2024-10-14T03:20:17Z 2024-10-14T03:20:17Z 2023 Article 10.1177/03064190231205415 2-s2.0-85173762004 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173762004&doi=10.1177%2f03064190231205415&partnerID=40&md5=6f32784cc12d37451ed2999393375e93 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/34510 SAGE Publications Inc. Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic Augmented reality
engineering education
multiple functions user interface
tangible user interface
Augmented reality
Computer software selection and evaluation
Engineering education
Students
Augmented reality technology
Comparative analyzes
Cross-sectional design
Engineering problems
Interface applications
Multiple function
Multiple function user interface
Tangible user interfaces
Users' experiences
Wilcoxon signed rank test
User interfaces
spellingShingle Augmented reality
engineering education
multiple functions user interface
tangible user interface
Augmented reality
Computer software selection and evaluation
Engineering education
Students
Augmented reality technology
Comparative analyzes
Cross-sectional design
Engineering problems
Interface applications
Multiple function
Multiple function user interface
Tangible user interfaces
Users' experiences
Wilcoxon signed rank test
User interfaces
Sidhu M.S.
Ying J.G.
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
description A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students� preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI. � The Author(s) 2023.
author2 56259597000
author_facet 56259597000
Sidhu M.S.
Ying J.G.
format Article
author Sidhu M.S.
Ying J.G.
author_sort Sidhu M.S.
title Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
title_short Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
title_full Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
title_fullStr Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
title_sort enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: a comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
publisher SAGE Publications Inc.
publishDate 2024
_version_ 1814061124521295872