Worst-case latency analysis for AVB traffic under overlapping-based time-triggered windows in time-sensitive networks
Deterministic and low end-to-end latency communication is an urgent demand for many safety-critical applications such as autonomous vehicles and automated industries. The time-sensitive network (TSN) is introduced as Ethernet-based amendments in IEEE 802.1 TSN standards to support timetriggered (T...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
2022
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/102648/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9758791 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
Summary: | Deterministic and low end-to-end latency communication is an urgent demand for many
safety-critical applications such as autonomous vehicles and automated industries. The time-sensitive
network (TSN) is introduced as Ethernet-based amendments in IEEE 802.1 TSN standards to support timetriggered (TT) traffic in these applications. In the presence of TT flows, TSN is designed to integrate
Audio/Video Bridging (AVB) and Best Effort (BE) traffic types. Although AVB traffic has a lower priority
than TT, it still requires low and deterministic latency performance, which may not be guaranteed under
strict predefined TT scheduling constraints. For this reason, a window-overlapping scheduling algorithm
is recently proposed in different works as analytical forms for TT latency under overlapping-windows
based. But worst-case AVB latency evaluation under overlapped TT windows is also essential for critical
optimizations and tradeoffs. In this paper, a worst-case end-to-end delay (WCD) for AVB traffic under
overlapping-based TT windows (AVB-OBTTW) algorithm is proposed. Separate analytical models are
derived using the network calculus (NC) approach for AVB-OBTTW with both non-preemption and
preemption mechanisms. Using an actual vehicular use case, the proposed models are evaluated with backto-back and porosity configurations under light and heavy loading scenarios. For specific AVB credit
bounds, a clear WCD reduction has been achieved by increasing the overlapping ratio (OR), especially under
back-to-back configuration. Preemption and non-preemption modes are compared under different loading
conditions, resulting in lower WCDs using preemption mode than non-preemption, especially with porosity
style. Compared to the latest related works, AVB-OBTTW reduces WCD bounds and increases unscheduled
bandwidth, leading to the highest enhancements with the maximum allowable OR. |
---|