Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability

Short-term agricultural courses equip participants with marketable knowledge through an amalgamation of theoretical lectures and hands-on workshops. As time has progressed, many courses have transitioned heavily away from traditional classroom settings and into digital mediums. A survey was conducte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abd Hamid, Izzah, Wan Yahaya, Wan Asrina
Format: Article
Published: Secholian Publication 2023
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107926/
https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/2328
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
id my.upm.eprints.107926
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.1079262024-09-26T04:54:16Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107926/ Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability Abd Hamid, Izzah Wan Yahaya, Wan Asrina Short-term agricultural courses equip participants with marketable knowledge through an amalgamation of theoretical lectures and hands-on workshops. As time has progressed, many courses have transitioned heavily away from traditional classroom settings and into digital mediums. A survey was conducted at Convocation Expo during the Agricultural Clinic session at the UPM Bintulu Sarawak Campus. About 156 surveys were evaluated, and the results showed that, despite the potential challenges and lack of adaptability, our participants preferred online agriculture courses over face-to-face learning. Many respondents (34.88%) agreed they would not sign up for an online farming course because they didn't believe in the outcomes (34.88%), the fees were too high (30.23%), the learning platform was inefficient (16.28%), and there was a lack of relevance to current agricultural practices (16.28%). Moreover, the lack of hands-on sessions (61.54%), a preoccupation with marketing strategies (11.54%), and a lack of familiarity with the internet's functionalities (11.54%) were all cited as reasons for the inadaptability and impracticality of online learning. Nearly half (47.44%) of respondents indicated a preference for free face-to-face training, but just 37.18% would be willing to do so (provided the fee was less than RM100). The proliferation of online classes across several platforms has made education more accessible than ever before, so long as the recorded sessions are archived online. However, without the appropriate information or the referral to professional experts, their agricultural operations would continue to be plagued by technical difficulties. Secholian Publication 2023 Article PeerReviewed Abd Hamid, Izzah and Wan Yahaya, Wan Asrina (2023) Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8 (5). art. no. e002328. pp. 1-9. ISSN 2504-8562 https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/2328 10.47405/mjssh.v8i5.2328
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Short-term agricultural courses equip participants with marketable knowledge through an amalgamation of theoretical lectures and hands-on workshops. As time has progressed, many courses have transitioned heavily away from traditional classroom settings and into digital mediums. A survey was conducted at Convocation Expo during the Agricultural Clinic session at the UPM Bintulu Sarawak Campus. About 156 surveys were evaluated, and the results showed that, despite the potential challenges and lack of adaptability, our participants preferred online agriculture courses over face-to-face learning. Many respondents (34.88%) agreed they would not sign up for an online farming course because they didn't believe in the outcomes (34.88%), the fees were too high (30.23%), the learning platform was inefficient (16.28%), and there was a lack of relevance to current agricultural practices (16.28%). Moreover, the lack of hands-on sessions (61.54%), a preoccupation with marketing strategies (11.54%), and a lack of familiarity with the internet's functionalities (11.54%) were all cited as reasons for the inadaptability and impracticality of online learning. Nearly half (47.44%) of respondents indicated a preference for free face-to-face training, but just 37.18% would be willing to do so (provided the fee was less than RM100). The proliferation of online classes across several platforms has made education more accessible than ever before, so long as the recorded sessions are archived online. However, without the appropriate information or the referral to professional experts, their agricultural operations would continue to be plagued by technical difficulties.
format Article
author Abd Hamid, Izzah
Wan Yahaya, Wan Asrina
spellingShingle Abd Hamid, Izzah
Wan Yahaya, Wan Asrina
Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
author_facet Abd Hamid, Izzah
Wan Yahaya, Wan Asrina
author_sort Abd Hamid, Izzah
title Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
title_short Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
title_full Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
title_fullStr Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
title_full_unstemmed Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Courses: An analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
title_sort face-to-face versus online agricultural courses: an analysis of preferences, challenges, and non-adaptability
publisher Secholian Publication
publishDate 2023
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107926/
https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/2328
_version_ 1811685966614626304