Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]

Geosynthetic structures for shore protection have demonstrably lower construction and lifetime costs than those of hard structures. This paper outlines the effect of scouring on banks protection structures stability in case of comparison between sand-stone wall and a geosynthetic structure that is c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moayedi, Hossein, Kim Huat, Bujang, Mohammad Ali, Thamer Ahmad, Bakhshipor, Zeinab, Ebadi, Mehdi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2011
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23019/1/23019.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23019/
http://ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas_july_2011.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
Language: English
id my.upm.eprints.23019
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.230192018-09-25T01:03:29Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23019/ Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis] Moayedi, Hossein Kim Huat, Bujang Mohammad Ali, Thamer Ahmad Bakhshipor, Zeinab Ebadi, Mehdi Geosynthetic structures for shore protection have demonstrably lower construction and lifetime costs than those of hard structures. This paper outlines the effect of scouring on banks protection structures stability in case of comparison between sand-stone wall and a geosynthetic structure that is commonly used for shore protection: geotextile wraparound revetments (GWRs). Different 2D Limit Equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis were carried out on a case study of sandstone example. As a result, GWRs have been shown to adapt extremely well against differential settlement and scour erosion. Analyses show that many advantages of sand-stone structures remain, but that geosynthetic structures should not be regarded as an alternative shore construction method. Rather, they are a preferable solution for numerous coastal problems. American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2011 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23019/1/23019.pdf Moayedi, Hossein and Kim Huat, Bujang and Mohammad Ali, Thamer Ahmad and Bakhshipor, Zeinab and Ebadi, Mehdi (2011) Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5 (7). pp. 1-6. ISSN 1991-8178 http://ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas_july_2011.html
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Geosynthetic structures for shore protection have demonstrably lower construction and lifetime costs than those of hard structures. This paper outlines the effect of scouring on banks protection structures stability in case of comparison between sand-stone wall and a geosynthetic structure that is commonly used for shore protection: geotextile wraparound revetments (GWRs). Different 2D Limit Equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis were carried out on a case study of sandstone example. As a result, GWRs have been shown to adapt extremely well against differential settlement and scour erosion. Analyses show that many advantages of sand-stone structures remain, but that geosynthetic structures should not be regarded as an alternative shore construction method. Rather, they are a preferable solution for numerous coastal problems.
format Article
author Moayedi, Hossein
Kim Huat, Bujang
Mohammad Ali, Thamer Ahmad
Bakhshipor, Zeinab
Ebadi, Mehdi
spellingShingle Moayedi, Hossein
Kim Huat, Bujang
Mohammad Ali, Thamer Ahmad
Bakhshipor, Zeinab
Ebadi, Mehdi
Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]
author_facet Moayedi, Hossein
Kim Huat, Bujang
Mohammad Ali, Thamer Ahmad
Bakhshipor, Zeinab
Ebadi, Mehdi
author_sort Moayedi, Hossein
title Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]
title_short Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]
title_full Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]
title_fullStr Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2D limit equilibrium and FEM modeling analysis]
title_sort comparison of geotube and stone cemented wall stability as coastal protection system [case study and 2d limit equilibrium and fem modeling analysis]
publisher American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
publishDate 2011
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23019/1/23019.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23019/
http://ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas_july_2011.html
_version_ 1643827937237008384