Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies

The accuracy of the numerical result is closely related to mesh density as well as its distribution. Mesh plays a very significant role in the outcome of numerical simulation. Many nasal airflow studies have employed unstructured mesh and more recently hybrid mesh scheme has been utilized considerin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zubair, Mohammed, Abdullah, Mohammed Zulkifly, Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28671/1/Hybrid%20mesh%20for%20nasal%20airflow%20studies.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28671/
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cmmm/2013/727362/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
Language: English
id my.upm.eprints.28671
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.286712015-11-17T01:54:23Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28671/ Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies Zubair, Mohammed Abdullah, Mohammed Zulkifly Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin The accuracy of the numerical result is closely related to mesh density as well as its distribution. Mesh plays a very significant role in the outcome of numerical simulation. Many nasal airflow studies have employed unstructured mesh and more recently hybrid mesh scheme has been utilized considering the complexity of anatomical architecture. The objective of this study is to compare the results of hybrid mesh with unstructured mesh and study its effect on the flow parameters inside the nasal cavity. A three-dimensional nasal cavity model is reconstructed based on computed tomographic images of a healthy Malaysian adult nose. Navier-Stokes equation for steady airflow is solved numerically to examine inspiratory nasal flow. The pressure drop obtained using the unstructured computational grid is about 22.6 Pa for a flow rate of 20 L/min, whereas the hybrid mesh resulted in 17.8 Pa for the same flow rate. The maximum velocity obtained at the nasal valve using unstructured grid is 4.18 m/s and that with hybrid mesh is around 4.76 m/s. Hybrid mesh reported lower grid convergence index (GCI) than the unstructured mesh. Significant differences between unstructured mesh and hybrid mesh are determined highlighting the usefulness of hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28671/1/Hybrid%20mesh%20for%20nasal%20airflow%20studies.pdf Zubair, Mohammed and Abdullah, Mohammed Zulkifly and Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin (2013) Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2013. art. no. 727362. pp. 1-7. ISSN 1748-670X; ESSN: 1748-6718 http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cmmm/2013/727362/ 10.1155/2013/727362
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description The accuracy of the numerical result is closely related to mesh density as well as its distribution. Mesh plays a very significant role in the outcome of numerical simulation. Many nasal airflow studies have employed unstructured mesh and more recently hybrid mesh scheme has been utilized considering the complexity of anatomical architecture. The objective of this study is to compare the results of hybrid mesh with unstructured mesh and study its effect on the flow parameters inside the nasal cavity. A three-dimensional nasal cavity model is reconstructed based on computed tomographic images of a healthy Malaysian adult nose. Navier-Stokes equation for steady airflow is solved numerically to examine inspiratory nasal flow. The pressure drop obtained using the unstructured computational grid is about 22.6 Pa for a flow rate of 20 L/min, whereas the hybrid mesh resulted in 17.8 Pa for the same flow rate. The maximum velocity obtained at the nasal valve using unstructured grid is 4.18 m/s and that with hybrid mesh is around 4.76 m/s. Hybrid mesh reported lower grid convergence index (GCI) than the unstructured mesh. Significant differences between unstructured mesh and hybrid mesh are determined highlighting the usefulness of hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies.
format Article
author Zubair, Mohammed
Abdullah, Mohammed Zulkifly
Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin
spellingShingle Zubair, Mohammed
Abdullah, Mohammed Zulkifly
Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin
Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
author_facet Zubair, Mohammed
Abdullah, Mohammed Zulkifly
Ahmad, Kamarul Arifin
author_sort Zubair, Mohammed
title Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
title_short Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
title_full Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
title_fullStr Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
title_sort hybrid mesh for nasal airflow studies
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
publishDate 2013
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28671/1/Hybrid%20mesh%20for%20nasal%20airflow%20studies.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28671/
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cmmm/2013/727362/
_version_ 1643829534361911296