Audit reports of financially distressed companies: emphasis of matter (EOM) versus disclaimers

This paper examines audit reports issued to 39 Malaysian listed companies in financial distress categorized as Practice Note 17 (PN17) companies by Bursa Malaysia. The study finds that for companies which experienced financial distress, the audit reports are not similar, despite all companies are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ismail, Hashanah, Mustapha, Mazlina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: David Publishing 2013
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/30837/1/Audit%20reports%20of%20financially%20distressed%20companies.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/30837/
http://www.davidpublishing.com/show.html?12806
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
Language: English
Description
Summary:This paper examines audit reports issued to 39 Malaysian listed companies in financial distress categorized as Practice Note 17 (PN17) companies by Bursa Malaysia. The study finds that for companies which experienced financial distress, the audit reports are not similar, despite all companies are similarly troubled financially. Companies receive either a disclaimer or an emphasis of matter (EOM) report. The study finds that which of the two reports is given is associated with three variables: current-year operating loss, shareholders’ deficit, and default status, implying that audit reports do convey information that financial distress is not of the same level and severity among PN17 companies.