Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique

Experiments were carried out using granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption techniques to treat wastewater contaminated with organic compounds caused by diverse human activities. Two techniques were assessed: adsorbent GAC prepared from coconut shell (GACC) and adsorbent GAC from palm shell (GACP)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khaleel, Mohammed R., Ahsan, Amimul, Imteaz , Monzur Alam, El-Sergany, Moetaz M., Nik Daud, Nik Norsyahariati, Mohamed, Thamer Ahmed, Ibrahim, Buthainah A.
Format: Article
Published: Techno-Press 2015
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34878/
http://121.183.206.200:8080/proto.board/articleContentView?journal=mwt&volume=6&num=4&ordernum=6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
id my.upm.eprints.34878
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.348782016-02-18T09:07:31Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34878/ Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique Khaleel, Mohammed R. Ahsan, Amimul Imteaz , Monzur Alam El-Sergany, Moetaz M. Nik Daud, Nik Norsyahariati Mohamed, Thamer Ahmed Ibrahim, Buthainah A. Experiments were carried out using granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption techniques to treat wastewater contaminated with organic compounds caused by diverse human activities. Two techniques were assessed: adsorbent GAC prepared from coconut shell (GACC) and adsorbent GAC from palm shell (GACP). A comparison of these two techniques was undertaken to identify ways to improve the efficiency of the treatment process. Analysis of the processed wastewater showed that with GACC the removal efficiency of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TDS) was 65, 60, 82, 82 and 8.7%, respectively, while in the case of GACP, the removal efficiency was 55, 60, 81, 91 and 22%, respectively. It can therefore be concluded that GACC is more effective than GACP for BOD removal, while GACP is better than GACC for TSS and TDS removal. It was also found that for COD and turbidity almost the same results were achieved by the two techniques. In addition, it was observed that both GACC and GACP reduced pH value to 7.9 after 24 hrs. Moreover, the optimal time period for removal of BOD and TDS was 1 hr and 3 hrs, respectively, for both techniques. Techno-Press 2015-07 Article PeerReviewed Khaleel, Mohammed R. and Ahsan, Amimul and Imteaz , Monzur Alam and El-Sergany, Moetaz M. and Nik Daud, Nik Norsyahariati and Mohamed, Thamer Ahmed and Ibrahim, Buthainah A. (2015) Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique. Membrane Water Treatment, 6 (4). pp. 339-349. ISSN 2005-8624; ESSN: 2092-7037 http://121.183.206.200:8080/proto.board/articleContentView?journal=mwt&volume=6&num=4&ordernum=6 10.12989/mwt.2015.6.4.339
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Experiments were carried out using granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption techniques to treat wastewater contaminated with organic compounds caused by diverse human activities. Two techniques were assessed: adsorbent GAC prepared from coconut shell (GACC) and adsorbent GAC from palm shell (GACP). A comparison of these two techniques was undertaken to identify ways to improve the efficiency of the treatment process. Analysis of the processed wastewater showed that with GACC the removal efficiency of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS) and total dissolved solids (TDS) was 65, 60, 82, 82 and 8.7%, respectively, while in the case of GACP, the removal efficiency was 55, 60, 81, 91 and 22%, respectively. It can therefore be concluded that GACC is more effective than GACP for BOD removal, while GACP is better than GACC for TSS and TDS removal. It was also found that for COD and turbidity almost the same results were achieved by the two techniques. In addition, it was observed that both GACC and GACP reduced pH value to 7.9 after 24 hrs. Moreover, the optimal time period for removal of BOD and TDS was 1 hr and 3 hrs, respectively, for both techniques.
format Article
author Khaleel, Mohammed R.
Ahsan, Amimul
Imteaz , Monzur Alam
El-Sergany, Moetaz M.
Nik Daud, Nik Norsyahariati
Mohamed, Thamer Ahmed
Ibrahim, Buthainah A.
spellingShingle Khaleel, Mohammed R.
Ahsan, Amimul
Imteaz , Monzur Alam
El-Sergany, Moetaz M.
Nik Daud, Nik Norsyahariati
Mohamed, Thamer Ahmed
Ibrahim, Buthainah A.
Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
author_facet Khaleel, Mohammed R.
Ahsan, Amimul
Imteaz , Monzur Alam
El-Sergany, Moetaz M.
Nik Daud, Nik Norsyahariati
Mohamed, Thamer Ahmed
Ibrahim, Buthainah A.
author_sort Khaleel, Mohammed R.
title Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
title_short Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
title_full Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
title_fullStr Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
title_full_unstemmed Performance of GACC and GACP to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
title_sort performance of gacc and gacp to treat institutional wastewater: a sustainable technique
publisher Techno-Press
publishDate 2015
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34878/
http://121.183.206.200:8080/proto.board/articleContentView?journal=mwt&volume=6&num=4&ordernum=6
_version_ 1643831286217834496